The reluctant innovator: orangutans and the phylogeny of creativity

Young orangutans are highly neophobic, avoid independent exploration and show a preference for social learning. Accordingly, they acquire virtually all their learned skills through exploration that is socially induced. Adult exploration rates are also low. Comparisons strongly suggest that major inn...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences Vol. 371; no. 1690; p. 20150183
Main Authors van Schaik, C. P., Burkart, J., Damerius, L., Forss, S. I. F., Koops, K., van Noordwijk, M. A., Schuppli, C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England The Royal Society 19.03.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Young orangutans are highly neophobic, avoid independent exploration and show a preference for social learning. Accordingly, they acquire virtually all their learned skills through exploration that is socially induced. Adult exploration rates are also low. Comparisons strongly suggest that major innovations, i.e. behaviours that have originally been brought into the population through individual invention, are made where ecological opportunities to do so are propitious. Most populations nonetheless have large innovation repertoires, because innovations, once made, are retained well through social transmission. Wild orangutans are therefore not innovative. In striking contrast, zoo-living orangutans actively seek novelty and are highly exploratory and innovative, probably because of positive reinforcement, active encouragement by human role models, increased sociality and an expectation of safety. The explanation for this contrast most relevant to hominin evolution is that captive apes generally have a highly reduced cognitive load, in particular owing to the absence of predation risk, which strongly reduces the costs of exploration. If the orangutan results generalize to other great apes, this suggests that our ancestors could have become more curious once they had achieved near-immunity to predation on the eve of the explosive increase in creativity characterizing the Upper Palaeolithic Revolution.
Bibliography:Theme issue ‘Innovation in animals and humans: understanding the origins and development of novel and creative behaviour’ compiled and edited by Simon M. Reader, Emma Flynn, Julie Morand-Ferron and Kevin N. Laland
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
One contribution of 15 to a theme issue ‘Innovation in animals and humans: understanding the origins and development of novel and creative behaviour’.
ISSN:0962-8436
1471-2970
DOI:10.1098/rstb.2015.0183