The European Forest Plant Species List (EuForPlant): Concept and applications

Question When evaluating forests in terms of their biodiversity, distinctiveness and naturalness, the affinity of the constituent species to forests is a crucial parameter. Here we ask to what extent are vascular plant species associated with forests, and does species’ affinity to forests vary betwe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of vegetation science Vol. 33; no. 3; pp. 1 - n/a
Main Authors Heinken, Thilo, Diekmann, Martin, Liira, Jaan, Orczewska, Anna, Schmidt, Marcus, Brunet, Jörg, Chytrý, Milan, Chabrerie, Olivier, Decocq, Guillaume, De Frenne, Pieter, Dřevojan, Pavel, Dzwonko, Zbigniew, Ewald, Jörg, Feilberg, Jon, Graae, Bente Jessen, Grytnes, John‐Arvid, Hermy, Martin, Kriebitzsch, Wolf‐Ulrich, Laiviņš, Māris, Lenoir, Jonathan, Lindmo, Sigrid, Marage, Damien, Marozas, Vitas, Niemeyer, Thomas, Paal, Jaanus, Pyšek, Petr, Roosaluste, Elle, Sádlo, Jiří, Schaminée, Joop H.J., Tyler, Torbjörn, Verheyen, Kris, Wulf, Monika, Vanneste, Thomas, Botta‐Dukát, Zoltán
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.05.2022
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Question When evaluating forests in terms of their biodiversity, distinctiveness and naturalness, the affinity of the constituent species to forests is a crucial parameter. Here we ask to what extent are vascular plant species associated with forests, and does species’ affinity to forests vary between European regions? Location Temperate and boreal forest biome of Northwestern and Central Europe. Methods We compiled EuForPlant, a new extensive list of forest vascular plant species in 24 regions spread across 13 European countries using vegetation databases and expert knowledge. Species were region‐specifically classified into four categories reflecting the degree of their affinity to forest habitats: 1.1, species of forest interiors; 1.2, species of forest edges and forest openings; 2.1, species that can be found in forest as well as open vegetation; and 2.2, species that can be found partly in forest, but mainly in open vegetation. An additional “O” category was distinguished, covering species typical for non‐forest vegetation. Results EuForPlant comprises 1,726 species, including 1,437 herb‐layer species, 159 shrubs, 107 trees, 19 lianas and 4 epiphytic parasites. Across regions, generalist forest species (with 450 and 777 species classified as 2.1 and 2.2, respectively) significantly outnumbered specialist forest species (with 250 and 137 species classified as 1.1 and 1.2, respectively). Even though the degree of shifting between the categories of forest affinity among regions was relatively low (on average, 17.5%), about one‐third of the forest species (especially 1.2 and 2.2) swapped categories in at least one of the study regions. Conclusions The proposed list can be used widely in vegetation science and global change ecology related to forest biodiversity and community dynamics. Shifting of forest affinity among regions emphasizes the importance of a continental‐scale forest plant species list with regional specificity. We compiled a new list of forest vascular plant species spread in large parts of the European temperate and boreal forest biome using vegetation databases and expert knowledge. Species were region‐specifically classified into four categories reflecting the degree of their affinity to forest habitats. EuForPlant can be used widely in vegetation ecology related to forest biodiversity and community dynamics.
Bibliography:Funding information
We are grateful to the Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO) for funding the scientific research network FLEUR. PDF and TV were supported by the European Research Council (ERC) through the ERC Starting Grant FORMICA (Grant/Award Number: 757833) and KV though the ERC Consolidator Grant PASTFORWARD (Grant/Award Number: 614839). JL was funded by the European Regional Development Fund (the Centre of Excellence EcolChange) and the Estonian Research Council (Grant/Award Number: PRG1223). MC and PD received funding from the Czech Science Foundation (Grant/Award Number: 19‐28491X), while PP was supported by EXPRO grant (Czech Science Foundation, Grant/Award Number: 19‐28807X) and long‐term research development project RVO (Czech Academy of Sciences, Grant/Award Number: 67985939)
Jon Feilberg and Wolf‐Ulrich Kriebitzsch authors are retired.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1100-9233
1654-1103
1654-1103
DOI:10.1111/jvs.13132