Diagnosing ASD in Adults Without ID: Accuracy of the ADOS-2 and the ADI-R

Diagnosing autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in adulthood often represents a challenge in clinical practice. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the ADOS and ADI-R in diagnosing ASD in adults. 113 subjects with an IQ of 70 or above were assessed through an ex...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of autism and developmental disorders Vol. 47; no. 11; pp. 3370 - 3379
Main Authors Fusar-Poli, Laura, Brondino, Natascia, Rocchetti, Matteo, Panisi, Cristina, Provenzani, Umberto, Damiani, Stefano, Politi, Pierluigi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.11.2017
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Diagnosing autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in adulthood often represents a challenge in clinical practice. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the ADOS and ADI-R in diagnosing ASD in adults. 113 subjects with an IQ of 70 or above were assessed through an extensive clinical evaluation. The ADOS-2 Module 4 and the ADI-R were separately administered by staff members blind to clinical judgment. Our results cautiously confirm the accuracy of ADOS-2 Module 4, while suggest that ADI-R might not be reliable in adults without intellectual disability. Clinicians’ training and experience remains of primary importance while assessing adults who could potentially belong to the autism spectrum.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0162-3257
1573-3432
1573-3432
DOI:10.1007/s10803-017-3258-2