Comprehensive expressional analysis of chemosensitivity‐related markers in large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung

Objectives Various drug‐sensitivity markers have been reported to be associated with tumor progression and chemotherapy resistance. Detailed expression profiles of sensitivity markers for cytotoxic chemotherapy in pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) remain unclear. Herein, we aimed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThoracic cancer Vol. 12; no. 20; pp. 2666 - 2679
Main Authors Ohtaki, Yoichi, Kaira, Kyoichi, Yajima, Toshiki, Erkhem‐Ochir, Bilguun, Kawashima, Osamu, Kamiyoshihara, Mitsuhiro, Igai, Hitoshi, Onozato, Ryoichi, Ibe, Takashi, Kosaka, Takayuki, Nakazawa, Seshiru, Nagashima, Toshiteru, Oyama, Tetsunari, Shirabe, Ken
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Melbourne John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 01.10.2021
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1759-7706
1759-7714
1759-7714
DOI10.1111/1759-7714.14102

Cover

More Information
Summary:Objectives Various drug‐sensitivity markers have been reported to be associated with tumor progression and chemotherapy resistance. Detailed expression profiles of sensitivity markers for cytotoxic chemotherapy in pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) remain unclear. Herein, we aimed to clarify the correlation between the expression of drug‐sensitivity markers and clinicopathological features, prognostic impact, and status of tumor immunity in patients with LCNEC. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the correlation between clinicopathological features and the expression of drug‐sensitivity‐related markers, including vascular endothelial growth factor 2 (VEGFR2), thymidylate synthase (TS), tubulin beta 3 class III (TUBB3), topoisomerase I (Topo‐I), and Topo‐II in 92 surgically resected LCNEC samples. Furthermore, we examined the prognostic significance of expression of these and their correlation with the immune cell status. Results Overall, high expression of TS, TUBB3, VEGFR2, Topo‐I, and Topo‐II was detected in 50 (54%), 31 (34%), 23 (25%), 65 (71%), and 36 (39%) samples, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that advanced pathological T and N factors, positive lymphatic permeation, and Topo‐II expression were independent unfavorable prognosticators for recurrence‐free survival, and advanced pathological T and N factors, Topo‐II positive expression, and TS positive expression were independent unfavorable prognosticators for overall survival. In terms of correlation with immune cell status, higher expression of VEGFR2 was closely linked to negative PD‐L1 expression. Conclusions These findings suggest that elevated Topo‐II and TS expression may contribute to poor outcomes through protumoral biology in patients with LCNEC, and elevated VEGFR2 expression might negatively impact tumor immune reactions in LCNEC. High expression of chemosensitive markers such as Topo‐II and TS may be responsible for the poor prognosis of LCNEC patients. Furthermore, VEGFR2 expression is negatively correlated with antitumor immune response and may not be just a chemosensitive marker. The expression of chemosensitive markers is an important prognostic factor for LCNEC and may be a biomarker of resistance to overall treatment of lung cancer, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Bibliography:Funding information
JSPS KAKENHI, Grant/Award Number: JP20K09175
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Funding information JSPS KAKENHI, Grant/Award Number: JP20K09175
ISSN:1759-7706
1759-7714
1759-7714
DOI:10.1111/1759-7714.14102