Comparison of multiple psychological distress measures between men and women preparing for in vitro fertilization

Objective To compare multiple measures of psychological distress between men and women preparing for IVF. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Outpatient, academic infertility clinic. Patient(s) One hundred sixty-two consecutive couples presenting for infertility treatment with IVF. Interventi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFertility and sterility Vol. 95; no. 2; pp. 717 - 721
Main Authors Wichman, Christina L., D.O, Ehlers, Shawna L., Ph.D, Wichman, Scott E., D.O, Weaver, Amy L., M.S, Coddington, Charles, M.D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.02.2011
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective To compare multiple measures of psychological distress between men and women preparing for IVF. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Outpatient, academic infertility clinic. Patient(s) One hundred sixty-two consecutive couples presenting for infertility treatment with IVF. Intervention(s) Measures were completed as part of a routine, infertility-focused psychological evaluation, including the Beck Depression Inventory, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, State-Trait Anger Inventory, and Impact of Events Scale. Main Outcome Measure(s) Scores of above psychological questionnaires. Result(s) Psychological distress scores were statistically significantly higher among women than men for symptoms of depression, state anxiety, infertility specific distress, and general perceived stress. However, aside from infertility-specific distress (d = .43), effect sizes for the paired differences between females and males ranged from d = .18 to .23. Conclusion(s) Women consistently scored higher on multiple measures of psychological distress than their male partners in the context of preparing for IVF. Comparison of infertility-specific distress scores yielded the largest statistically and clinically significant difference compared with traditional measures of general depression and anxiety symptoms.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.043
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0015-0282
1556-5653
DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.043