Strengthening the Reporting of Molecular Epidemiology for Infectious Diseases (STROME-ID): an extension of the STROBE statement

Molecular data are now widely used in epidemiological studies to investigate the transmission, distribution, biology, and diversity of pathogens. Our objective was to establish recommendations to support good scientific reporting of molecular epidemiological studies to encourage authors to consider...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Lancet infectious diseases Vol. 14; no. 4; pp. 341 - 352
Main Authors Field, Nigel, Cohen, Ted, Struelens, Marc J, Palm, Daniel, Cookson, Barry, Glynn, Judith R, Gallo, Valentina, Ramsay, Mary, Sonnenberg, Pam, MacCannell, Duncan, Charlett, Andre, Egger, Matthias, Green, Jonathan, Vineis, Paolo, Abubakar, Ibrahim
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Elsevier Ltd 01.04.2014
Lancet Publishing Group
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Molecular data are now widely used in epidemiological studies to investigate the transmission, distribution, biology, and diversity of pathogens. Our objective was to establish recommendations to support good scientific reporting of molecular epidemiological studies to encourage authors to consider specific threats to valid inference. The statement Strengthening the Reporting of Molecular Epidemiology for Infectious Diseases (STROME-ID) builds upon the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) initiative. The STROME-ID statement was developed by a working group of epidemiologists, statisticians, bioinformaticians, virologists, and microbiologists with expertise in control of infection and communicable diseases. The statement focuses on issues relating to the reporting of epidemiological studies of infectious diseases using molecular data that were not addressed by STROBE. STROME-ID addresses terminology, measures of genetic diversity within pathogen populations, laboratory methods, sample collection, use of molecular markers, molecular clocks, timeframe, multiple-strain infections, non-independence of infectious-disease data, missing data, ascertainment bias, consistency between molecular and epidemiological data, and ethical considerations with respect to infectious-disease research. In total, 20 items were added to the 22 item STROBE checklist. When used, the STROME-ID recommendations should advance the quality and transparency of scientific reporting, with clear benefits for evidence reviews and health-policy decision making.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Instructional Material/Guideline-3
ObjectType-Review-4
content type line 23
ISSN:1473-3099
1474-4457
1474-4457
DOI:10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70324-4