ssDNA is not superior to dsDNA as long HDR donors for CRISPR-mediated endogenous gene tagging in human diploid RPE1 and HCT116 cells

Recent advances in CRISPR technology have enabled us to perform gene knock-in in various species and cell lines. CRISPR-mediated knock-in requires donor DNA which serves as a template for homology-directed repair (HDR). For knock-in of short sequences or base substitutions, ssDNA donors are frequent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC genomics Vol. 24; no. 1; p. 289
Main Authors Mabuchi, Akira, Hata, Shoji, Genova, Mariya, Tei, Chiharu, Ito, Kei K, Hirota, Masayasu, Komori, Takuma, Fukuyama, Masamitsu, Chinen, Takumi, Toyoda, Atsushi, Kitagawa, Daiju
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 29.05.2023
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Recent advances in CRISPR technology have enabled us to perform gene knock-in in various species and cell lines. CRISPR-mediated knock-in requires donor DNA which serves as a template for homology-directed repair (HDR). For knock-in of short sequences or base substitutions, ssDNA donors are frequently used among various other forms of HDR donors, such as linear dsDNA. However, partly due to the complexity of long ssDNA preparation, it remains unclear whether ssDNA is the optimal type of HDR donors for insertion of long transgenes such as fluorescent reporters in human cells. In this study, we established a nuclease-based simple method for the preparation of long ssDNA with high yield and purity, and comprehensively compared the performance of ssDNA and dsDNA donors with 90 bases of homology arms for endogenous gene tagging with long transgenes in human diploid RPE1 and HCT116 cells. Quantification using flow cytometry revealed lower efficiency of endogenous fluorescent tagging with ssDNA donors than with dsDNA. By analyzing knock-in outcomes using long-read amplicon sequencing and a classification framework, a variety of mis-integration events were detected regardless of the donor type. Importantly, the ratio of precise insertion was lower with ssDNA donors than with dsDNA. Moreover, in off-target integration analyses using donors without homology arms, ssDNA and dsDNA were comparably prone to non-homologous integration. These results indicate that ssDNA is not superior to dsDNA as long HDR donors with relatively short homology arms for gene knock-in in human RPE1 and HCT116 cells.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1471-2164
1471-2164
DOI:10.1186/s12864-023-09377-3