The Fallacy of Misplaced Leadership

The leadership literature typically talks about the discrete individuality of its subject and particularly the personal qualities and capabilities of a few key people occupying top positions in a hierarchy. Current leadership research now has begun to generate new knowledge about leadership practice...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of management studies Vol. 42; no. 6; pp. 1101 - 1121
Main Author Wood, Martin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2005
Wiley Blackwell
SeriesJournal of Management Studies
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0022-2380
1467-6486
DOI10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00535.x

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The leadership literature typically talks about the discrete individuality of its subject and particularly the personal qualities and capabilities of a few key people occupying top positions in a hierarchy. Current leadership research now has begun to generate new knowledge about leadership practice in relations of interpersonal exchange. Nevertheless, there is an urgent need for the ramifications of this insight to be more sufficiently developed. The current discussion explores how a perspective of process studies challenges the dominance of the field by individual social actors and discrete schemes of relations. Its aims are twofold. First, it will show how both of these latter epistemologies are lacking and suggest that current leadership research and development activities must rise to the ontological challenge of processes rather than things. Second, it looks at some methodological implications of this way of thinking as a productive incitement to future management studies.
Bibliography:istex:06696D73A62F879E58E83BF1D4D87B2E97ECF6EA
I would like to express my appreciation to Professor Peter Case, Dr Keith Robinson, Dr Ceri Brown, Andre Spicer, Deborah Williamson, and the three anonymous Journal of Management Studies reviewers, for their insightful comments and critical engagement with earlier drafts of this article.
ark:/67375/WNG-MH6LJ42L-1
ArticleID:JOMS535
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-2380
1467-6486
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00535.x