The Fallacy of Misplaced Leadership
The leadership literature typically talks about the discrete individuality of its subject and particularly the personal qualities and capabilities of a few key people occupying top positions in a hierarchy. Current leadership research now has begun to generate new knowledge about leadership practice...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of management studies Vol. 42; no. 6; pp. 1101 - 1121 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.09.2005
Wiley Blackwell |
Series | Journal of Management Studies |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0022-2380 1467-6486 |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00535.x |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The leadership literature typically talks about the discrete individuality of its subject and particularly the personal qualities and capabilities of a few key people occupying top positions in a hierarchy. Current leadership research now has begun to generate new knowledge about leadership practice in relations of interpersonal exchange. Nevertheless, there is an urgent need for the ramifications of this insight to be more sufficiently developed. The current discussion explores how a perspective of process studies challenges the dominance of the field by individual social actors and discrete schemes of relations. Its aims are twofold. First, it will show how both of these latter epistemologies are lacking and suggest that current leadership research and development activities must rise to the ontological challenge of processes rather than things. Second, it looks at some methodological implications of this way of thinking as a productive incitement to future management studies. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:06696D73A62F879E58E83BF1D4D87B2E97ECF6EA I would like to express my appreciation to Professor Peter Case, Dr Keith Robinson, Dr Ceri Brown, Andre Spicer, Deborah Williamson, and the three anonymous Journal of Management Studies reviewers, for their insightful comments and critical engagement with earlier drafts of this article. ark:/67375/WNG-MH6LJ42L-1 ArticleID:JOMS535 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0022-2380 1467-6486 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00535.x |