The Global Fund: why anti-corruption, transparency and accountability matter

• Published in: Globalization and health Vol. 17; no. 1; p. 108
• Main Authors: Chang, Zhihao, Rusu, Violet, Kohler, Jillian C
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 18.09.2021; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Accountability; Acquired immune deficiency syndrome; Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; ACTA; AIDS; Anti-corruption; Beneficiaries; Conflicts of interest; Corruption; Ethics; Financial Management; Financing; Financing, Organized; Fraud; Funding; GFATM; Global Fund; Global Health; Grants; HIV; Human immunodeficiency virus; Humans; International organizations; Laws, regulations and rules; Malaria; Political aspects; Prevention; Risk management; Social aspects; Social Responsibility; Transparency; Tuberculosis; Vector-borne diseases; Whistle blowing; Whistleblowing; Canada; ACTA; GFATM; Transparency; The fund; Global Fund; Accountability; Anti-corruption
• ISSN: 1744-8603; 1744-8603
• DOI: 10.1186/s12992-021-00753-w

The creation of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, also known as the Global Fund, was prompted by the lack of a timely and effective global response, and the need for financing to fight against three devastating diseases: HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria. During the formation of the Global Fund, necessary anti-corruption, transparency, and accountability (ACTA) structures were not put in place to prevent fraud and corruption in its grants, which resulted in the misuse of funds by grant recipients and an eventual loss of donor confidence in 2011. The Global Fund has instituted various ACTA mechanisms to address this misuse of funding and the subsequent loss of donor confidence, and this paper seeks to understand these implementations and their impacts over the past decade, in an effort to probe ACTA more deeply. By restructuring the governing committees in 2011, and the Audit and Finance; Ethics and Governance; and Strategy Committees in 2016, the Global Fund has delineated committee mandates and strengthened the Board's oversight of operations. Additionally, the Global Fund has adopted a rigorous risk management framework which it has worked into all aspects of its functioning. An Ethics and Integrity Framework was adopted in 2014 and an Ethics Office was established in 2016, resulting in increased conflict of interest disclosures and greater considerations of ethics within the organization. The Global Fund's Office of the Inspector General (OIG) has effectively performed internal and external audits and investigations on fraud and corruption, highlighted potential risks for mitigation, and has implemented ACTA initiatives, such as the I Speak Out Now! campaign to encourage whistleblowing and educate on fraud and corruption. From 2011 onwards, the Global Fund has developed a number of ACTA mechanisms which, in particular, resulted in reduced grant-related risks and procurement fraud as demonstrated by the decreased classification from high to moderate in 2017, and the reduction of investigations in 2018 respectively. However, it is crucial that the Global Fund continues to evaluate the effectiveness of these mechanisms; monitor for potential perverse impacts; and make necessary changes, when and where they are needed.