Universal health coverage and the poor: to what extent are health financing policies making a difference? Evidence from a benefit incidence analysis in Zambia

• Published in: BMC public health Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 1546 - 11
• Main Authors: Rudasingwa, Martin, De Allegri, Manuela, Mphuka, Chrispin, Chansa, Collins, Yeboah, Edmund, Bonnet, Emmanuel, Ridde, Valéry, Chitah, Bona Mukosha
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 13.08.2022; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Benefit incidence analysis; Childrens health; Delivery services; Economics and Finance; Fees & charges; Financing; Health aspects; Health benefits; Health care; Health care expenditures; Health care facilities; Health care policy; Health financing; Health Policy; Health services; Health services utilization; Healthcare Financing; Humanities and Social Sciences; Humans; Incidence; Laws, regulations and rules; Life Sciences; Maternal & child health; Medical care, Cost of; Mortality; Policies; Poor; Population; Public health; Reforms; Santé publique et épidémiologie; Socioeconomic factors; Socioeconomics; UHC; Universal Health Insurance; Zambia; Zambia; UHC; Zambia; Benefit incidence analysis; Health financing; Health benefits
• ISSN: 1471-2458; 1471-2458
• DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13923-1

Zambia has invested in several healthcare financing reforms aimed at achieving universal access to health services. Several evaluations have investigated the effects of these reforms on the utilization of health services. However, only one study has assessed the distributional incidence of health spending across different socioeconomic groups, but without differentiating between public and overall health spending and between curative and maternal health services. Our study aims to fill this gap by undertaking a quasi-longitudinal benefit incidence analysis of public and overall health spending between 2006 and 2014. We conducted a Benefit Incidence Analysis (BIA) to measure the socioeconomic inequality of public and overall health spending on curative services and institutional delivery across different health facility typologies at three time points. We combined data from household surveys and National Health Accounts. Results showed that public (concentration index of - 0.003; SE 0.027 in 2006 and - 0.207; SE 0.011 in 2014) and overall (0.050; SE 0.033 in 2006 and - 0.169; SE 0.011 in 2014) health spending on curative services tended to benefit the poorer segments of the population while public (0.241; SE 0.018 in 2007 and 0.120; SE 0.007 in 2014) and overall health spending (0.051; SE 0.022 in 2007 and 0.116; SE 0.007 in 2014) on institutional delivery tended to benefit the least-poor. Higher inequalities were observed at higher care levels for both curative and institutional delivery services. Our findings suggest that the implementation of UHC policies in Zambia led to a reduction in socioeconomic inequality in health spending, particularly at health centres and for curative care. Further action is needed to address existing barriers for the poor to benefit from health spending on curative services and at higher levels of care.