A general strategy for the evolution of bond-forming enzymes using yeast display

The ability to routinely generate efficient protein catalysts of bond-forming reactions chosen by researchers, rather than nature, is a long-standing goal of the molecular life sciences. Here, we describe a directed evolution strategy for enzymes that catalyze, in principle, any bond-forming reactio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 108; no. 28; pp. 11399 - 11404
Main Authors Chen, Irwin, Dorr, Brent M., Liu, David R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 12.07.2011
National Acad Sciences
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The ability to routinely generate efficient protein catalysts of bond-forming reactions chosen by researchers, rather than nature, is a long-standing goal of the molecular life sciences. Here, we describe a directed evolution strategy for enzymes that catalyze, in principle, any bond-forming reaction. The system integrates yeast display, enzyme-mediated bioconjugation, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting to isolate cells expressing proteins that catalyze the coupling of two substrates chosen by the researcher. We validated the system using model screens for Staphylococcus aureus sortase A—catalyzed transpeptidation activity, resulting in enrichment factors of 6,000-fold after a single round of screening. We applied the system to evolve sortase A for improved catalytic activity. After eight rounds of screening, we isolated variants of sortase A with up to a 140-fold increase in LPETG-coupling activity compared with the starting wild-type enzyme. An evolved sortase variant enabled much more efficient labeling of LPETG-tagged human CD154 expressed on the surface of HeLa cells compared with wild-type sortase. Because the method developed here does not rely on any particular screenable or selectable property of the substrates or product, it represents a powerful alternative to existing enzyme evolution methods.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ObjectType-Article-2
Edited by David Baker, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, and approved May 24, 2011 (received for review January 22, 2011)
Author contributions: I.C., B.M.D., and D.R.L. designed research; I.C. and B.M.D. performed research; I.C. and B.M.D. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; I.C., B.M.D., and D.R.L. analyzed data; and I.C., B.M.D., and D.R.L. wrote the paper.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1101046108