Spatio-temporal impacts of aerial adulticide applications on populations of West Nile virus vector mosquitoes

• Published in: Parasites & vectors Vol. 14; no. 1; pp. 120 - 15
• Main Authors: Holcomb, Karen M, Reiner, Robert C, Barker, Christopher M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 24.02.2021; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Abundance; Additives; Adulticide; Aerial spraying; Animal Distribution; Animals; Aquatic insects; Carbon dioxide; Collections; Control; Crop diseases; Crop dusting; Culex - drug effects; Culex - growth & development; Culex pipiens; Culex tarsalis; Culicidae; Disease control; Dispersal; Distribution; Ecosystem; Epidemics; Estimates; Female; GAM; Generalized additive models; Geographical distribution; Habitats; Humans; Insecticides; Insecticides - pharmacology; Land use; Male; Models, Biological; Mosquito Control - instrumentation; Mosquito Control - methods; Mosquito Vectors - drug effects; Mosquito Vectors - growth & development; Mosquitoes; Organophosphates; Organophosphorus pesticides; Pesticides; Population; Population Density; Population Dynamics; Populations; Public health; Pyrethrins - pharmacology; Pyrethroids; Rain; Seasons; Spatio-Temporal Analysis; Sprays; Stochasticity; Trapping; Trends; Urban areas; Vector-borne diseases; Vectors; Virus-vector relationships; Viruses; Weather; West Nile Fever - transmission; West Nile Fever - virology; West Nile virus; West Nile virus - physiology; United States; Sacramento California; California; Central Valley; United States > US; Culex tarsalis; GAM; Mosquitoes; Adulticide; Mosquito-borne disease; Spatial-temporal model; Generalized additive models; West Nile virus; Aerial spraying; Culex pipiens
• ISSN: 1756-3305; 1756-3305
• DOI: 10.1186/s13071-021-04616-6

Aerial applications of insecticides that target adult mosquitoes are widely used to reduce transmission of West Nile virus to humans during periods of epidemic risk. However, estimates of the reduction in abundance following these treatments typically focus on single events, rely on pre-defined, untreated control sites and can vary widely due to stochastic variation in population dynamics and trapping success unrelated to the treatment. To overcome these limitations, we developed generalized additive models fitted to mosquito surveillance data collected from CO -baited traps in Sacramento and Yolo counties, California from 2006 to 2017. The models accounted for the expected spatial and temporal trends in the abundance of adult female Culex (Cx.) tarsalis and Cx. pipiens in the absence of aerial spraying. Estimates for the magnitude of deviation from baseline abundance following aerial spray events were obtained from the models. At 1-week post-treatment with full spatial coverage of the trapping area by pyrethroid or pyrethrin products, Cx. pipiens abundance was reduced by a mean of 52.4% (95% confidence intrval [CI] - 65.6, - 36.5%) while the use of at least one organophosphate pesticide resulted in a mean reduction of 76.2% (95% CI - 82.8, - 67.9%). For Cx. tarsalis, at 1-week post-treatment with full coverage there was a reduction in abundance of 30.7% (95% CI - 54.5, 2.5%). Pesticide class was not a significant factor contributing to the reduction. In comparison, repetition of spraying over three to four consecutive weeks resulted in similar estimates for Cx. pipiens and estimates of somewhat smaller magnitude for Cx. tarsalis. Aerial adulticides are effective for achieving a rapid short-term reduction of the abundance of the primary West Nile virus vectors, Cx. tarsalis and Cx. pipiens. A larger magnitude of reduction was estimated in Cx. pipiens, possibly due to the species' focal distribution. Effects of aerial sprays on Cx. tarsalis populations are likely modulated by the species' large dispersal ability, population sizes and vast productive larval habitat present in the study area. Our modeling approach provides a new way to estimate effects of public health pesticides on vector populations using routinely collected observational data and accounting for spatio-temporal trends and contextual factors like weather and habitat. This approach does not require pre-selected control sites and expands upon past studies that have focused on the effects of individual aerial treatment events.