Probabilistic model of the human protein-protein interaction network

A catalog of all human protein-protein interactions would provide scientists with a framework to study protein deregulation in complex diseases such as cancer. Here we demonstrate that a probabilistic analysis integrating model organism interactome data, protein domain data, genome-wide gene express...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNature biotechnology Vol. 23; no. 8; pp. 951 - 959
Main Authors Chinnaiyan, Arul M, Rhodes, Daniel R, Tomlins, Scott A, Varambally, Sooryanarayana, Mahavisno, Vasudeva, Barrette, Terrence, Kalyana-Sundaram, Shanker, Ghosh, Debashis, Pandey, Akhilesh
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Nature 01.08.2005
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A catalog of all human protein-protein interactions would provide scientists with a framework to study protein deregulation in complex diseases such as cancer. Here we demonstrate that a probabilistic analysis integrating model organism interactome data, protein domain data, genome-wide gene expression data and functional annotation data predicts nearly 40,000 protein-protein interactions in humans-a result comparable to those obtained with experimental and computational approaches in model organisms. We validated the accuracy of the predictive model on an independent test set of known interactions and also experimentally confirmed two predicted interactions relevant to human cancer, implicating uncharacterized proteins into definitive pathways. We also applied the human interactome network to cancer genomics data and identified several interaction subnetworks activated in cancer. This integrative analysis provides a comprehensive framework for exploring the human protein interaction network.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:1087-0156
1546-1696
DOI:10.1038/nbt1103