A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Computer-driven Protocolized Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation

Duration of weaning from mechanical ventilation may be reduced by the use of a systematic approach. We assessed whether a closed-loop knowledge-based algorithm introduced in a ventilator to act as a computer-driven weaning protocol can improve patient outcomes as compared with usual care. We conduct...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine Vol. 174; no. 8; pp. 894 - 900
Main Authors Lellouche, Franccois, Mancebo, Jordi, Jolliet, Philippe, Roeseler, Jean, Schortgen, Frederique, Dojat, Michel, Cabello, Belen, Bouadma, Lila, Rodriguez, Pablo, Maggiore, Salvatore, Reynaert, Marc, Mersmann, Stefan, Brochard, Laurent
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Am Thoracic Soc 15.10.2006
American Lung Association
American Thoracic Society
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Duration of weaning from mechanical ventilation may be reduced by the use of a systematic approach. We assessed whether a closed-loop knowledge-based algorithm introduced in a ventilator to act as a computer-driven weaning protocol can improve patient outcomes as compared with usual care. We conducted a multicenter randomized controlled study with concealed allocation to compare usual care for weaning with computer-driven weaning. The computerized protocol included an automatic gradual reduction in pressure support, automatic performance of spontaneous breathing trials (SBT), and generation of an incentive message when an SBT was successfully passed. One hundred forty-four patients were enrolled before weaning initiation. They were randomly allocated to computer-driven weaning or to physician-controlled weaning according to local guidelines. Weaning duration until successful extubation and total duration of ventilation were the primary endpoints. Weaning duration was reduced in the computer-driven group from a median of 5 to 3 d (p=0.01) and total duration of mechanical ventilation from 12 to 7.5 d (p=0.003). Reintubation rate did not differ (23 vs. 16%, p=0.40). Computer-driven weaning also decreased median intensive care unit (ICU) stay duration from 15.5 to 12 d (p=0.02) and caused no adverse events. The amount of sedation did not differ between groups. In the usual care group, compliance to recommended modes and to SBT was estimated, respectively, at 96 and 51%. The specific computer-driven system used in this study can reduce mechanical ventilation duration and ICU length of stay, as compared with a physician-controlled weaning process.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-2
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
PMCID: PMC4788698
ISSN:1073-449X
1535-4970
DOI:10.1164/rccm.200511-1780OC