De-implementation of detrimental feeding practices: a pilot protocol

• Published in: Pilot and feasibility studies Vol. 6; no. 1; p. 181
• Main Authors: Swindle, Taren, Rutledge, Julie M, Johnson, Susan L, Selig, James P, Curran, Geoff M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 19.11.2020; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: African Americans; Baby foods; Child care; Childcare; Children & youth; De-implementation; Diet; Evidence-based medicine; Evidence-based practice; Families & family life; Feeding practices; Food; Fruits; Implementation science; Intervention; Meals; Nutrition; Nutrition research; Quality control; Study Protocol; Teachers; Vegetables; United States > US; Childcare; Feeding practices; Nutrition; De-implementation; Implementation science
• ISSN: 2055-5784; 2055-5784
• DOI: 10.1186/s40814-020-00720-z

Early childhood educators (ECEs) often use detrimental feeding practices and are slow to implement positive feeding practices. Nevertheless, few studies have aimed to understand and change ECEs' feeding practices. This gap needs to be addressed because implementation (i.e., adding new, evidence-based practices) and de-implementation (i.e., stopping low-value or harmful practices) are distinct processes that require unique strategies. We will develop a de-implementation strategy for detrimental feeding practices using evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI) sessions to engage stakeholders and draw on the Niven process model for de-implementation. Then, we will investigate the effects of the de-implementation strategy in a proof-of-principle study. The de-implementation strategy will be evaluated in 2 partnering childcare agencies using a pre-post, within-site design. For our primary outcome, we will interview educators throughout the school year to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and survey them with standard measures for assessing feasibility and acceptability. For secondary outcomes, we will investigate its effects on the use of detrimental and evidence-based feeding practices by teachers and impacts on child BMI and diet. The current study will establish the feasibility and acceptability of our de-implementation approach and will provide preliminary data toward 3 predicted secondary outcomes: (1) decreased detrimental feeding practices by ECEs, (2) increased adoption of and fidelity to nutrition promotion practices, and (3) improved child dietary outcomes. These results are expected to contribute to the uptake and sustainability of mealtime interventions to improve the diets of young children. Results will also apply to the field of implementation science by informing processes for developing de-implementation approaches in a community setting.