Dichotomy between the humoral and cellular responses elicited by mRNA and adenoviral vector vaccines against SARS-CoV-2

Protection from severe disease and hospitalization by SARS-CoV-2 vaccination has been amply demonstrated by real-world data. However, the rapidly evolving pandemic raises new concerns. One pertains efficacy of adenoviral vector-based vaccines, particularly the single-dose Ad26.COV2.S, relative to mR...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC medicine Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 32 - 7
Main Authors Ukey, Rahul, Bruiners, Natalie, Mishra, Hridesh, Mishra, Pankaj K., McCloskey, Deborah, Onyuka, Alberta, Chen, Fei, Pinter, Abraham, Weiskopf, Daniela, Sette, Alessandro, Roy, Jason, Gaur, Sunanda, Gennaro, Maria Laura
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 25.01.2022
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Protection from severe disease and hospitalization by SARS-CoV-2 vaccination has been amply demonstrated by real-world data. However, the rapidly evolving pandemic raises new concerns. One pertains efficacy of adenoviral vector-based vaccines, particularly the single-dose Ad26.COV2.S, relative to mRNA vaccines. We investigated the immunogenicity of Ad26.COV2.S and mRNA vaccines in 33 subjects vaccinated with either vaccine class 5 months earlier on average. After controlling for the time since vaccination, Spike-binding antibody and neutralizing antibody levels were higher in the mRNA-vaccinated subjects, while no significant differences in antigen-specific B cell and T cell responses were observed between the two groups. A dichotomy exists between the humoral and cellular responses elicited by the two vaccine classes. Testing only for humoral responses to compare the durability of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-induced responses, as typically performed for public health and research purposes, is insufficient.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Correspondence-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Letter to the Editor-1
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1741-7015
1741-7015
DOI:10.1186/s12916-022-02252-0