Language Universals in Human Brains

• Published in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 105; no. 14; pp. 5321 - 5325
• Main Authors: Berent, Iris, Lennertz, Tracy, Jun, Jongho, Moreno, Miguel A., Smolensky, Paul
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States National Academy of Sciences 08.04.2008; National Acad Sciences
• Subjects: Auditory Perception; Brain; Consonants; Humans; Korea; Language; Linguistic universals; Optimality theory; Phonetics; Phonology; Psychology; Social Sciences; Speech; Speech Articulation Tests; Studies; Syllables; Vowels; Words; Korea
• ISSN: 0027-8424; 1091-6490
• DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0801469105

Do speakers know universal restrictions on linguistic elements that are absent from their language? We report an experimental test of this question. Our case study concerns the universal restrictions on initial consonant sequences, onset clusters (e.g., bl in block). Across languages, certain onset clusters (e.g., lb) are dispreferred (e.g., systematically under-represented) relative to others (e.g., bl). We demonstrate such preferences among Korean speakers, whose language lacks initial C₁C₂ clusters altogether. Our demonstration exploits speakers' well known tendency to misperceive ill-formed clusters. We show that universally dispreferred onset clusters are more frequently misperceived than universally preferred ones, indicating that Korean speakers consider the former cluster-type more ill-formed. The misperception of universally ill-formed clusters is unlikely to be due to a simple auditory failure. Likewise, the aversion of universally dispreferred onsets by Korean speakers is not explained by English proficiency or by several phonetic and phonological properties of Korean. We conclude that language universals are neither relics of language change nor are they artifacts of generic limitations on auditory perception and motor control-they reflect universal linguistic knowledge, active in speakers' brains.