Point-of-care ultrasound induced changes in management of unselected patients in the emergency department - a prospective single-blinded observational trial

• Published in: Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine Vol. 28; no. 1; p. 47
• Main Authors: Weile, Jesper, Frederiksen, Christian A, Laursen, Christian B, Graumann, Ole, Sloth, Erik, Kirkegaard, Hans
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 29.05.2020; Springer Nature B.V; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Abdomen; Bladder; Cardiac patients; Clinical trials; Comorbidity; Disease; Emergency medical care; Fainting; Family physicians; Hospital emergency services; Hypertension; Lungs; Medical research; Mortality; Observational studies; Original Research; Pathology; Patients; Physicians; Pneumothorax; Point of care testing; Skin cancer; Ultrasonic imaging; Vital signs; United States > US; Illinois; Chicago Illinois
• ISSN: 1757-7241; 1757-7241
• DOI: 10.1186/s13049-020-00740-x

Point-of-Care ultrasound (POCUS) changes the management in specific groups of patients in the Emergency Department (ED). It seems intuitive that POCUS holds an unexploited potential on a wide variety of patients. However, little is known about the effect of ultrasound on the broad spectrum of unselected patients in the ED. This study aimed to identify the effect on the clinical management if POCUS was applied on unselected patients. Secondarily the study aimed to identify predictors of ultrasound changing management. This study was a blinded observational single center trial. A basic whole body POCUS protocol was performed in extension to the physical examination. The blinded treating physicians were interviewed about the presumptive diagnosis and plan for the patient. Subsequently the physicians were unblinded to the POCUS results and asked to choose between five options regarding the benefit from POCUS results. A total of 403 patients were enrolled in this study. The treating physicians regarded POCUS examinations influence on the diagnostic workup or treatment as following: 1) No new information: 249 (61.8%), 2) No further action: 45 (11.2%), 3) Further diagnostic workup needed: 52 (12.9%), 4) Presumptive diagnosis confirmed 38 (9.4%), and 5) Immediate treatment needed: 19 (4.7%). Predictors of beneficial ultrasound were: (a) triage > 1, (b) patient comorbidities (cardiac disease, hypertension or lung disease), or (c) patients presenting with abdominal pain, dyspnea, or syncope. POCUS was found to be potentially beneficial in 27.0% of all patients. High triage score, known cardiac disease, hypertension, pulmonary diseases, a clinical presentation with abdominal pain, dyspnea, or syncope are predictors of this. Future research should focus on patient-important outcomes when applying POCUS on these patients. The trail was registered prior to patient inclusion with the Danish Data Protection Agency (https://www.datatilsynet.dk/ Case no: 1-16-02-603-14) and Clinical Trials (www.clinicaltrials.gov/ Protocol ID: DNVK1305018).