Implementation Frameworks for Artificial Intelligence Translation Into Health Care Practice: Scoping Review

• Published in: Journal of medical Internet research Vol. 24; no. 1; p. e32215
• Main Authors: Gama, Fábio, Tyskbo, Daniel, Nygren, Jens, Barlow, James, Reed, Julie, Svedberg, Petra
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Canada Journal of Medical Internet Research 27.01.2022; Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH, Associate Professor; JMIR Publications
• Subjects: Analysis; Artificial Intelligence; Classification; Clinical decision making; Clinical medicine; Decision-making; Delivery of Health Care; Dependency; Ethics; Evidence-based medicine; Group decision making; Health care; Health care reform; Health Personnel; Humans; IDC; Implementation; implementation framework; Implementation Science; Inequality; Intelligence; Knowledge; Literature reviews; Machine learning; Medical personnel; Medical Subject Headings-MeSH; Review; scoping review; service innovation; Technology; Translation; implementation framework; artificial intelligence; scoping review
• ISSN: 1438-8871; 1439-4456; 1438-8871
• DOI: 10.2196/32215

Significant efforts have been made to develop artificial intelligence (AI) solutions for health care improvement. Despite the enthusiasm, health care professionals still struggle to implement AI in their daily practice. This paper aims to identify the implementation frameworks used to understand the application of AI in health care practice. A scoping review was conducted using the Cochrane, Evidence Based Medicine Reviews, Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO databases to identify publications that reported frameworks, models, and theories concerning AI implementation in health care. This review focused on studies published in English and investigating AI implementation in health care since 2000. A total of 2541 unique publications were retrieved from the databases and screened on titles and abstracts by 2 independent reviewers. Selected articles were thematically analyzed against the Nilsen taxonomy of implementation frameworks, and the Greenhalgh framework for the nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability (NASSS) of health care technologies. In total, 7 articles met all eligibility criteria for inclusion in the review, and 2 articles included formal frameworks that directly addressed AI implementation, whereas the other articles provided limited descriptions of elements influencing implementation. Collectively, the 7 articles identified elements that aligned with all the NASSS domains, but no single article comprehensively considered the factors known to influence technology implementation. New domains were identified, including dependency on data input and existing processes, shared decision-making, the role of human oversight, and ethics of population impact and inequality, suggesting that existing frameworks do not fully consider the unique needs of AI implementation. This literature review demonstrates that understanding how to implement AI in health care practice is still in its early stages of development. Our findings suggest that further research is needed to provide the knowledge necessary to develop implementation frameworks to guide the future implementation of AI in clinical practice and highlight the opportunity to draw on existing knowledge from the field of implementation science.