Appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for the management of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) using the AGREE II Instrument: A systematic review

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 14; no. 7; p. e0219239
• Main Authors: Amer, Yasser Sami, Al-Joudi, Haya Faisal, Varnham, Jeremy L, Bashiri, Fahad A, Hamad, Muddathir Hamad, Al Salehi, Saleh M, Daghash, Hadeel Fakhri, Albatti, Turki Homod
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 05.07.2019; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - therapy; Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; Authorship; Bibliographic data bases; Biology and Life Sciences; Care and treatment; Clinical medicine; Clinical practice guidelines; Databases, Factual; Education; Embedding; Evaluation; Evidence-based medicine; Evidence-Based Practice; Guidelines; Health care; Health care industry; Hospitals; Humans; Hyperactivity; Literature reviews; Management; Medical care quality; Medical personnel training; Medicine; Medicine and Health Sciences; Neurosciences; Pediatrics; Practice guidelines (Medicine); Practice Guidelines as Topic; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - trends; Protocol (computers); Quality standards; Research and Analysis Methods; Scientific papers; Systematic review; Saudi Arabia; United Kingdom > UK; United States > US; Riyadh Saudi Arabia
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219239

High quality evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have a major impact on the appropriate diagnosis and management and positive outcomes. The evidence-based healthcare for patients with attention deficit hyperactive disorder (ADHD) is challenging. The objective of this study was to appraise the quality of published CPGs for ADHD. A systematic review was conducted for ADHD CPGs using CPG databases, DynaMed, PubMed, and Google Scholar. The quality of each included CPG was appraised by three independent appraisers using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. Six CPGs were critically reviewed. The AGREE II standardized domain scores revealed variation between the quality of these CPGs with the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE), University of Michigan Health System, and American Academy of Pediatrics CPGs as the top three. Overall, the recommendations for management of ADHD were similar in these CPGs. Reporting of CPG development is often poorly documented. Guideline development groups should aim to follow the AGREE II criteria to improve the standards and quality of CPGs. The NICE CPG showed the best quality. Embedding the AGREE II appraisal of CPGs in the training and education of healthcare providers is recommended. The protocol for this study was published in PROSPERO (International prospective register of systematic reviews). Link: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42017078712 and is additionally available from protocols.io. Link: https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.q27dyhn.