The land assembly problem revisited

• Published in: Regional science and urban economics Vol. 34; no. 2; pp. 155 - 162
• Main Authors: Menezes, Flavio, Pitchford, Rohan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.03.2004; Elsevier; Elsevier Sequoia S.A
• Series: Regional Science and Urban Economics
• Subjects: Coordination; Developers; Economic theory; Inefficient delay; Land; Land assembly; Point of sale; Property; Property values; Real estate sales; Regional studies; Studies; Urban economics; Urban studies; Inefficient delay; Coordination; C78; Land assembly; R52; C72
• ISSN: 0166-0462; 1879-2308
• DOI: 10.1016/S0166-0462(03)00041-3

As in the standard land assembly problem, a developer wants to buy two adjacent blocks of land belonging to two different owners. The value of the two blocks of land to the developer is greater than the sum of the individual values of the blocks for each owner. Unlike the land assembly literature, however, our focus is on the incentive that each lot owner has to delay the start of negotiations, rather than on the public goods nature of the problem. An incentive for delay exists, for example, when owners perceive that being last to sell will allow them to capture a larger share of the joint surplus from the development. We show that competition at point of sale can cause equilibrium delay, and that cooperation at point of sale will eliminate delay. This suggests that strategic delay is another source for the inefficient allocation of land, in addition to the public-good type externality pointed out by Grossman and Hart [Bell Journal of Economics 11 (1980) 42] and O’Flaherty [Regional Science and Urban Economics 24 (1994) 287].