Thigmotaxis in a virtual human open field test

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 11; no. 1; p. 6670
• Main Authors: Gromer, Daniel, Kiser, Dominik P., Pauli, Paul
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 23.03.2021; Nature Publishing Group; Nature Portfolio
• Subjects: 631/477/2811; 692/699/476/1300; Animal behavior; Animal models; Anxiety; Anxiety disorders; Behavior; Computer applications; Humanities and Social Sciences; Mental disorders; multidisciplinary; Neurobiology; Open-field behavior; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Species; Thigmotaxis; Translation; Validity
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85678-5

Animal models are used to study neurobiological mechanisms in mental disorders. Although there has been significant progress in the understanding of neurobiological underpinnings of threat-related behaviors and anxiety, little progress was made with regard to new or improved treatments for mental disorders. A possible reason for this lack of success is the unknown predictive and cross-species translational validity of animal models used in preclinical studies. Re-translational approaches, therefore, seek to establish cross-species translational validity by identifying behavioral operations shared across species. To this end, we implemented a human open field test in virtual reality and measured behavioral indices derived from animal studies in three experiments ( N = 31 , N = 30 , and N = 80 ). In addition, we investigated the associations between anxious traits and such behaviors. Results indicated a strong similarity in behavior across species, i.e., participants in our study—like rodents in animal studies—preferred to stay in the outer region of the open field, as indexed by multiple behavioral parameters. However, correlational analyses did not clearly indicate that these behaviors were a function of anxious traits of participants. We conclude that the realized virtual open field test is able to elicit thigmotaxis and thus demonstrates cross-species validity of this aspect of the test. Modulatory effects of anxiety on human open field behavior should be examined further by incorporating possible threats in the virtual scenario and/or by examining participants with higher anxiety levels or anxiety disorder patients.