Smoke or smokeless moxibustion treatment for breech presentation: A three‐arm pilot trial

Aims We conducted a pilot trial to compare the effects of smoke and smokeless moxibustion with a control as a possible supplement to external cephalic version (ECV) for converting breech to cephalic presentation and increasing adherence to cephalic position, and to assess their effects on the well‐b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJapan journal of nursing science : JJNS Vol. 18; no. 4; pp. e12426 - n/a
Main Authors Higashihara, Akiko, Horiuchi, Shigeko
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Melbourne John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 01.10.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aims We conducted a pilot trial to compare the effects of smoke and smokeless moxibustion with a control as a possible supplement to external cephalic version (ECV) for converting breech to cephalic presentation and increasing adherence to cephalic position, and to assess their effects on the well‐being of the mother and child. Methods We used a quasi‐experimental design with 3 arms: a smoke moxibustion (SM) (n = 20) and smokeless moxibustion (SLM) (n = 20) groups (20‐min acupoint BL67 stimulation once or twice daily for 10–14 days), and a control group (n = 20). The participants had singleton breech presentations between 33 and 35 gestation weeks. The primary outcome was cephalic presentation at the conclusion of intervention. The secondary outcomes were cephalic presentation at birth and effects on mother and child well‐being. Results At the conclusion of intervention, cephalic presentation was higher in the SLM (60.0%) than the control groups (25.0%), Relative Risk 2.40, 95% Confidence Interval [1.04–5.56]; there was no significant difference for SM. At birth, there were no significant differences in cephalic presentation or well‐being. Conclusion SLM treatment showed an increasing trend towards cephalic presentation at the conclusion of intervention. Although significant differences were not observed at birth possibly due to the small samples and non‐randomization, moxibustion was safe, and not associated with perinatal morbidity and mortality. A randomized controlled trial with a larger sample is warranted to ascertain SLM treatment as a possible ECV supplement for converting and increasing adherence to cephalic position.
Bibliography:Funding information
Clinical Trial registration
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI, Grant/Award Numbers: 16H05589, 17H06985; The Japan Academy of Midwifery Grant‐in‐Aid for Encouragement of Scientists; Yamaji Fumiko Nursing Research Fund
This study was financially supported by (a) Yamaji Fumiko Nursing Research Fund, (b) Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP 16H05589 and 17H06985, and (c) the Japan Academy of Midwifery Grant‐in‐Aid for Encouragement of Scientists.
UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (Registered: UMIN000021377).
Parts of this study were presented in an oral presentation session at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Japan Academy of Midwifery, March 2018, Yokohama, Japan. Our study closely adheres to the CONSORT guidelines.
ISSN:1742-7932
1742-7924
DOI:10.1111/jjns.12426