A systematic review of workplace health promotion interventions for increasing physical activity
Purpose The benefits of an active lifestyle are widely documented, yet studies show that only a small proportion of adults engage in sufficient levels of physical activity. The workplace presents an ideal avenue for delivering initiatives to promote physical activity, overcoming commonly cited barri...
Saved in:
Published in | British journal of health psychology Vol. 19; no. 1; pp. 149 - 180 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.02.2014
British Psychological Society Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Purpose
The benefits of an active lifestyle are widely documented, yet studies show that only a small proportion of adults engage in sufficient levels of physical activity. The workplace presents an ideal avenue for delivering initiatives to promote physical activity, overcoming commonly cited barriers such as a ‘lack of time’ and providing access to a large intersection of society. The purpose of this study was to (1) explore the types of interventions workplaces implement to promote physical activity among staff, (2) describe the characteristics of those interventions, (3) understand whether these interventions positively impact on activity levels, and (4) assess the methodological quality of studies.
Methods
A systematic review of workplace physical activity interventions published up to April 2011 was conducted to identify types of interventions and their outcomes.
Results
Of the 58 studies included, the majority utilized health promotion initiatives. There were six physical activity/exercise interventions, 13 counselling/support interventions, and 39 health promotion messages/information interventions. Thirty‐two of these studies showed a statistically significant increase in a measure of physical activity against a control group at follow‐up.
Conclusions
While the studies included in this review show some evidence that workplace physical activity interventions can be efficacious, overall the results are inconclusive. Despite the proliferation of research in this area, there is still a need for more well‐designed studies to fully determine the effectiveness of workplace interventions for increasing physical activity and to identify the types of interventions that show the most promise.
Statement of contribution
What is already known on this subject?
Despite the recognized health benefits of regular physical activity, only a small proportion of adults engage in sufficient levels of physical activity.
The workplace presents an ideal avenue for the delivery of initiatives to promote physical activity.
Previous reviews have concluded that the efficacy of workplace physical activity interventions is unclear and that many published studies are of poor methodological quality.
What does this study add?
This systematic review includes more randomized controlled trials and quasi‐experimental studies than previously published reviews of workplace physical activity interventions.
While the studies included in this review do show some evidence that workplace physical activity interventions can be efficacious, overall the results are inconclusive.
This review highlights that there is still a need for further well‐designed studies to be carried out in order to evaluate the effectiveness of workplace interventions for increasing physical activity and identify the types of interventions that show the most promise. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:611388198A11C2F207A17CD0640920688056DDB0 Table S1. Characteristics and results of selected studies: physical activity/exercise interventions.Table S2. Characteristics and results of selected studies: counselling/support interventions.Table S3. Characteristics and results of selected studies: health promotion messages/information. ArticleID:BJHP12052 ark:/67375/WNG-QKB7K3J7-R The second author conceived and designed the study, acted as second reviewer for selection of articles, participated in interpretation of data and critically revised the manuscript. The first author participated in study design, acted as first reviewer for selection of articles, interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. The third author participated in interpretation of data and critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-4 |
ISSN: | 1359-107X 2044-8287 2044-8287 |
DOI: | 10.1111/bjhp.12052 |