Does Europe perform too little corporate R&D? A comparison of EU and non-EU corporate R&D performance

This paper examines whether there are significant differences in private R&D investment performance between the EU and the US and, if so, why. The study is based on data from the 2008 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard. The investigation assesses the effects of three very distinct facto...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inResearch policy Vol. 39; no. 4; pp. 523 - 536
Main Authors Moncada-Paternò-Castello, Pietro, Ciupagea, Constantin, Smith, Keith, Tübke, Alexander, Tubbs, Mike
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.05.2010
Elsevier
Elsevier Sequoia S.A
SeriesResearch Policy
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper examines whether there are significant differences in private R&D investment performance between the EU and the US and, if so, why. The study is based on data from the 2008 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard. The investigation assesses the effects of three very distinct factors that can determine the relative size of the overall R&D intensities of the two economies: these are the influence of sector composition ( structural effect) vis-à-vis the intensity of R&D in each sector ( intrinsic effect) and company demographics. The paper finds that the lower overall corporate R&D intensity for the EU is the result of sector specialisation ( structural effect) – the US has a stronger sectoral specialisation in the high R&D intensity (especially ICT-related) sectors than the EU does, and also has a much larger population of R&D investing firms within these sectors. Since aggregate R&D indicators are so closely dependent on industrial structures, many of the debates and claims about differences in comparative R&D performance are in effect about industrial structure rather than sectoral R&D performance. These have complex policy implications that are discussed in the closing section.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0048-7333
1873-7625
DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.012