Feasibility of Automating Insulin Delivery for the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes
Feasibility of Automating Insulin Delivery for the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes Garry M. Steil 1 , Kerstin Rebrin 1 , Christine Darwin 2 , Farzam Hariri 2 and Mohammed F. Saad 3 1 Medtronic MiniMed, Northridge, California 2 David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los...
Saved in:
Published in | Diabetes (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 55; no. 12; pp. 3344 - 3350 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Alexandria, VA
American Diabetes Association
01.12.2006
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Feasibility of Automating Insulin Delivery for the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes
Garry M. Steil 1 ,
Kerstin Rebrin 1 ,
Christine Darwin 2 ,
Farzam Hariri 2 and
Mohammed F. Saad 3
1 Medtronic MiniMed, Northridge, California
2 David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
3 Departments of Medicine and Preventative Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Garry M. Steil, Medtronic MiniMed, 18000 Devonshire St., Northridge, CA
91325. E-mail: garry.steil{at}medtronic.com
Abstract
An automated closed-loop insulin delivery system based on subcutaneous glucose sensing and subcutaneous insulin delivery was
evaluated in 10 subjects with type 1 diabetes (2 men, 8 women, mean [±SD] age 43.4 ± 11.4 years, duration of diabetes 18.2
± 13.5 years). Closed-loop control was assessed over ∼30 h and compared with open-loop control assessed over 3 days. Closed-loop
insulin delivery was calculated using a model of the β-cell’s multiphasic insulin response to glucose. Plasma glucose was
160 ± 66 mg/dl at the start of closed loop and was thereafter reduced to 71 ± 19 by 1:00 p.m. (preprandial lunch). Fasting glucose the subsequent morning on closed loop was not different from target (124 ± 25 vs. 120
mg/dl, respectively; P > 0.05). Mean glucose levels were not different between the open and closed loop (133 ± 63 vs. 133 ± 52 mg/dl, respectively;
P > 0.65). However, glucose was within the range 70–180 mg/dl 75% of the time under closed loop versus 63% for open loop. Incidence
of biochemical hypoglycemia (blood glucose <60 mg/dl) was similar under the two treatments. There were no episodes of severe
hypoglycemia. The data provide proof of concept that glycemic control can be achieved by a completely automated external closed-loop
insulin delivery system.
CGMS, continuous glucose monitoring system
CSII, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion
DIR, daily insulin requirement
FFA, free fatty acid
MAD, mean absolute difference
SG, sensor glucose
Footnotes
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore
be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Accepted September 6, 2006.
Received March 29, 2006.
DIABETES |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0012-1797 1939-327X |
DOI: | 10.2337/db06-0419 |