高原型藏绵羊春季补饲试验

【目的】研究旨在探讨补饲对减少冷季掉膘的作用。【方法】在西藏当雄选择年龄为4.5周岁（2胎）的泌乳期母羊、8-12月龄后备母羊,分别进行60、90 d的补饲试验。【结果】结果表明,泌乳母羊试验组增重0.61 kg,而泌乳母羊对照组活重损失4.94kg,两者之间存在极显著差异（P〈0.01）,补饲组间差异不显著（P〈0.05）;后备母羊试验组增重6.44 kg,而后备母羊对照组活重损失1.3 kg,两者之间存在极显著差异（P〈0.01）,补饲组间差异不显著（P〈0.05）。【结论】在青藏高原高寒草地,春季牧草青黄不接、自然放牧绵羊普遍掉膘的情况下,通过补饲精料可以有效提高增重、减轻载畜压力,获得...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in西南农业学报 Vol. 30; no. 4; pp. 975 - 977
Main Author 张立 央金 洛桑催成 格桑加措 扎西 德庆卓嘎 次仁曲珍 巴桑吉巴 普布次仁 李宝海
Format Journal Article
LanguageChinese
Published 西藏自治区农牧科学院畜牧兽医研究所,绵羊改良研究室,西藏拉萨850009%西藏自治区农牧科学院,西藏拉萨,850000 2017
Subjects
保膘
放牧＋补饲
日增重
藏羊
保膘
Grazing + supplement
Tibetan sheep
Fat keeping
藏羊
放牧+补饲
日增重
Daily weight gains
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1001-4829
DOI10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2017.4.042

Cover

More Information
Summary:【目的】研究旨在探讨补饲对减少冷季掉膘的作用。【方法】在西藏当雄选择年龄为4.5周岁（2胎）的泌乳期母羊、8-12月龄后备母羊,分别进行60、90 d的补饲试验。【结果】结果表明,泌乳母羊试验组增重0.61 kg,而泌乳母羊对照组活重损失4.94kg,两者之间存在极显著差异（P〈0.01）,补饲组间差异不显著（P〈0.05）;后备母羊试验组增重6.44 kg,而后备母羊对照组活重损失1.3 kg,两者之间存在极显著差异（P〈0.01）,补饲组间差异不显著（P〈0.05）。【结论】在青藏高原高寒草地,春季牧草青黄不接、自然放牧绵羊普遍掉膘的情况下,通过补饲精料可以有效提高增重、减轻载畜压力,获得良好的经济效益。
Bibliography:ZHANG Li1 , YANG Jin1 , Luosangcuicheng1 , Gengsangjiacuo1 , ZHA Xi1 , Deqingzhuoga1 , Cirenquzhen1 , Basangjiba1 , Pubuciren1, LI Bao-hai2 （ 1. Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, Tibet Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Science, Tibet Lhasa 850009, China;2. Tibet Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Science,Tibet Lhasa 850000, China）
51-1213/S
Tibetan sheep ; Grazing ＋ supplement; Daily weight gains ; Fat keeping
[ Objective] The aim of research was the investigation on feeding which played a great role in decreasing losing body weight of Tibetan sheep in Spring. [ Method ] The lactating ewes of 4.5 years （2 tires） and reserve ewes of 8-12 months in Damxung were selected as tested materials, and the feeding trials of 60, 90 days were conducted, respectively. [ Result] The experimental lactating ewe weighted 0.61 kg, while the lactating ewe in control group reduced g. 94 kg, there were a significant difference between them （P 〈0.01 ）, and not significant difference between the feedin
ISSN:1001-4829
DOI:10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2017.4.042