Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To analyze the prognostic value of programmed death factor ligand 1 (PD-L1) in colorectal cancer. Electronic databases, such as PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane library, were searched to identify studies evaluating the PD-L1 expression and overall survival (OS) in these patients. Afterwa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld journal of surgical oncology Vol. 17; no. 1; p. 4
Main Authors Shen, Zefeng, Gu, Lihu, Mao, Danyi, Chen, Manman, Jin, Rongjia
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 04.01.2019
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To analyze the prognostic value of programmed death factor ligand 1 (PD-L1) in colorectal cancer. Electronic databases, such as PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane library, were searched to identify studies evaluating the PD-L1 expression and overall survival (OS) in these patients. Afterwards, the relevant data were extracted to perform the meta-analysis. A total of 3481 patients were included in 10 studies. The combined hazard ratio (HR) was 1.22 (95%CI = 1.01-1.48, P = 0.04), indicating that high expression of PD-L1 was significantly correlated with poor prognosis of colorectal cancer. Apropos of clinicopathological features, the merged odds ratio (OR) exhibited that highly expressed PD-L1 was firmly related to lymphatic invasion (OR = 3.49, 95%CI = 1.54-7.90, P = 0.003) and advanced stage (OR = 1.77, 95%CI = 1.41-2.23, P < 0.00001), but not correlative with patients' gender, microsatellite instability, or tumor location. The expression of PD-L1 can be utilized as an independent factor in judging the prognosis of colorectal cancer, and patients with advanced cancer or lymphatic invasion are more likely to express PD-L1. This conclusion may lay a theoretical foundation for the application of PD-1/PD-L1 immunoassay point inhibitors but still needs verifying by sizeable well-designed cohort studies.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1477-7819
1477-7819
DOI:10.1186/s12957-018-1544-x