Cerebral coherence between communicators marks the emergence of meaning

How can we understand each other during communicative interactions? An influential suggestion holds that communicators are primed by each other’s behaviors, with associative mechanisms automatically coordinating the production of communicative signals and the comprehension of their meanings. An alte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 111; no. 51; pp. 18183 - 18188
Main Authors Stolk, Arjen, Noordzij, Matthijs L., Verhagen, Lennart, Volman, Inge, Schoffelen, Jan-Mathijs, Oostenveld, Robert, Hagoort, Peter, Toni, Ivan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 23.12.2014
National Acad Sciences
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:How can we understand each other during communicative interactions? An influential suggestion holds that communicators are primed by each other’s behaviors, with associative mechanisms automatically coordinating the production of communicative signals and the comprehension of their meanings. An alternative suggestion posits that mutual understanding requires shared conceptualizations of a signal’s use, i.e., “conceptual pacts” that are abstracted away from specific experiences. Both accounts predict coherent neural dynamics across communicators, aligned either to the occurrence of a signal or to the dynamics of conceptual pacts. Using coherence spectral-density analysis of cerebral activity simultaneously measured in pairs of communicators, this study shows that establishing mutual understanding of novel signals synchronizes cerebral dynamics across communicators’ right temporal lobes. This interpersonal cerebral coherence occurred only within pairs with a shared communicative history, and at temporal scales independent from signals’ occurrences. These findings favor the notion that meaning emerges from shared conceptualizations of a signal’s use. Significance Building on recent electrophysiological evidence showing that novel communicative behavior relies on computations that operate over temporal scales independent from transient sensorimotor behavior, here we report that those computations occur simultaneously in pairs with a shared communicative history, but not in pairs without a shared history. This pair-specific interpersonal synchronization was driven by communicative episodes in which communicators needed to mutually adjust their conceptualizations of a signal’s use. That interpersonal cerebral synchronization was absent when communicators used stereotyped signals. These findings indicate that establishing mutual understanding is implemented through simultaneous in-phase coordination of cerebral activity across communicators, consistent with the notion that pair members temporally synchronize their conceptualizations of a signal’s use.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1414886111
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
1A.S. and M.L.N. contributed equally to this work.
Author contributions: M.L.N. and I.T. designed research; M.L.N. and I.V. performed research; A.S. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; A.S., M.L.N., L.V., J.-M.S., R.O., and I.T. analyzed data; and A.S., L.V., P.H., and I.T. wrote the paper.
Edited by Asif A. Ghazanfar, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and accepted by the Editorial Board October 31, 2014 (received for review August 4, 2014)
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1414886111