Real-time compression feedback for patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest: a multi-center randomized controlled clinical trial

• Published in: Journal of intensive care Vol. 7; no. 1; p. 5
• Main Authors: Goharani, Reza, Vahedian-Azimi, Amir, Farzanegan, Behrooz, Bashar, Farshid R, Hajiesmaeili, Mohammadreza, Shojaei, Seyedpouzhia, Madani, Seyed J, Gohari-Moghaddam, Keivan, Hatamian, Sevak, Mosavinasab, Seyed M M, Khoshfetrat, Masoum, Khabiri Khatir, Mohammad A, Miller, Andrew C
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 22.01.2019; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Analysis; Automation; Cardiac arrest; Cardio First Angel; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Care and treatment; Chest compression; Clinical outcomes; Clinical trials; CPR; Critical care; Epidemiology; Evidence-based medicine; Feedback; Feedback (Electronics); Health aspects; Heart attacks; Hospital patients; Hospitals; Intensive care; Intensive care units; Outcome and process assessment (Medical care); Patients; Resuscitation; Services; Workforce planning; Chest compression; Critical care; Intensive care; CPR; Resuscitation; Cardio First Angel
• ISSN: 2052-0492; 2052-0492
• DOI: 10.1186/s40560-019-0357-5

To determine if real-time compression feedback using a non-automated hand-held device improves patient outcomes from in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel study (no crossover) of patients with IHCA in the mixed medical-surgical intensive care units (ICUs) of eight academic hospitals. Patients received either standard manual chest compressions or compressions performed with real-time feedback using the Cardio First Angel™ (CFA) device. The primary outcome was sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and secondary outcomes were survival to ICU and hospital discharge. One thousand four hundred fifty-four subjects were randomized; 900 were included. Sustained ROSC was significantly improved in the CFA group (66.7% vs. 42.4%,  < 0.001), as was survival to ICU discharge (59.8% vs. 33.6%) and survival to hospital discharge (54% vs. 28.4%,  < 0.001). Outcomes were not affected by intra-group comparisons based on intubation status. ROSC, survival to ICU, and hospital discharge were noted to be improved in inter-group comparisons of non-intubated patients, but not intubated ones. Use of the CFA compression feedback device improved event survival and survival to ICU and hospital discharge. The study was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02845011), registered retrospectively on July 21, 2016.