Mitochondrial and plastid genome architecture: Reoccurring themes, but significant differences at the extremes

Mitochondrial and plastid genomes show a wide array of architectures, varying immensely in size, structure, and content. Some organelle DNAs have even developed elaborate eccentricities, such as scrambled coding regions, nonstandard genetic codes, and convoluted modes of posttranscriptional modifica...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 112; no. 33; pp. 10177 - 10184
Main Authors Smith, David Roy, Patrick J. Keeling
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 18.08.2015
National Acad Sciences
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Mitochondrial and plastid genomes show a wide array of architectures, varying immensely in size, structure, and content. Some organelle DNAs have even developed elaborate eccentricities, such as scrambled coding regions, nonstandard genetic codes, and convoluted modes of posttranscriptional modification and editing. Here, we compare and contrast the breadth of genomic complexity between mitochondrial and plastid chromosomes. Both organelle genomes have independently evolved many of the same features and taken on similar genomic embellishments, often within the same species or lineage. This trend is most likely because the nuclear-encoded proteins mediating these processes eventually leak from one organelle into the other, leading to a high likelihood of processes appearing in both compartments in parallel. However, the complexity and intensity of genomic embellishments are consistently more pronounced for mitochondria than for plastids, even when they are found in both compartments. We explore the evolutionary forces responsible for these patterns and argue that organelle DNA repair processes, mutation rates, and population genetic landscapes are all important factors leading to the observed convergence and divergence in organelle genome architecture.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1422049112
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by John P. McCutcheon, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, and accepted by the Editorial Board January 27, 2015 (received for review November 20, 2014)
Author contributions: D.R.S. and P.J.K. designed research; D.R.S. performed research; and D.R.S. wrote the paper.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1422049112