Surface properties and gloss of CAD/CAM composites after toothbrush abrasion testing

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surface properties and gloss of CAD/CAM composites after toothbrush abrasion testing. Four CAD/CAM composites for molars (Cerasmart 300, Estelite P block, Katana Avencia P block, and KZR-CAD HR3 Gammatheta), one CAD/CAM composite for premolars (Shofu Blo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Oral Science Vol. 61; no. 2; pp. 358 - 363
Main Authors Okamura, Kentaro, Koizumi, Hiroyasu, Kodaira, Akihisa, Nogawa, Hiroshi, Yoneyama, Takayuki
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan Nihon University School of Dentistry 2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surface properties and gloss of CAD/CAM composites after toothbrush abrasion testing. Four CAD/CAM composites for molars (Cerasmart 300, Estelite P block, Katana Avencia P block, and KZR-CAD HR3 Gammatheta), one CAD/CAM composite for premolars (Shofu Block HC Hard), and one feldspathic ceramics (Vitablocs Mark II) were assessed. Knoop hardness number, gloss, and surface roughness (Ra, Rz, and Sa) were measured before and after toothbrush abrasion testing. Knoop hardness number values were in the order Vitablocs Mark II > Katana Avencia P block > Estelite P Block > Shofu Block HC Hard > Cerasmart 300 > KZR-CAD HR3 Gammatheta. After testing, the gloss of Estelite P block and KZR-CAD HR3 Gammatheta was greatly decreased and surface roughness was greatly increased. Periodic recall and re-polishing may thus be necessary when these products are used clinically.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1343-4934
1880-4926
DOI:10.2334/josnusd.18-0350