The public washroom - friend or foe? An observational study of washroom cleanliness combined with microbiological investigation of hand hygiene facilities

• Published in: Antimicrobial resistance & infection control Vol. 8; no. 1; pp. 47 - 6
• Main Authors: Suen, Lorna K P, Siu, Gilman K H, Guo, Yue Ping, Yeung, Simon K W, Lo, Kiki Y K, O'Donoghue, Margaret
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 28.02.2019; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Aminoglycosides; Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology; Antibacterial agents; Antimicrobial; Antimicrobial agents; Bacteria; Bacteria - drug effects; Bacteria - isolation & purification; Cefoxitin; Clindamycin; Colony Count, Microbial; Cross-Sectional Studies; Disease control; Dispensers; Drug resistance; Environmental Microbiology; Equipment Contamination - statistics & numerical data; Erythromycin; Hand Disinfection - instrumentation; Hand hygiene; Handwashing; Health aspects; Humans; Hygiene; Infection control; Investigations; Laboratories; MALDI-TOF MS; Mass spectrometry; Methicillin; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Microbiology; Microbiota; Microorganisms; Observational studies; Penicillins; Public Facilities; Public health; Scientific imaging; Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization; Spectroscopy; Studies; Toilet Facilities; Urogenital system; Washers & dryers; Washroom; Antimicrobial; MALDI-TOF MS; Microorganisms; Hand hygiene; Washroom; Hand drying; Bacteria; Toilet; Public health; Environmental microbiology
• ISSN: 2047-2994; 2047-2994
• DOI: 10.1186/s13756-019-0500-z

Many people use handwashing and hand-drying facilities in public washrooms under the impression that these amenities are hygienic. However, such facilities may be potential sites for the transmission of pathogenic bacteria. This study aimed to examine the hygiene facilities provided including handwashing and hand-drying facilities in public washrooms. Total bacterial counts and species identification were determined for hand-drying facilities. Antimicrobial susceptibilities were performed. The bacterial contamination levels of 55 public washrooms ranging in category from low class communities to high end establishments, were examined. The hygienic environment and facilities of the washrooms were analysed using an electronic checklist to facilitate immediate data entry. Pre-moistened sterile swabs were used to collect samples from areas around the outlet of paper towel dispensers, air outlet of air dryers, exit door handles and paper towels in the washrooms. Total bacterial counts were performed and isolates identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by disk diffusion. The high and middle-income categories washrooms generally had cleaner facilities and environment followed by those in low categories. Fifty-two bacterial species were identified from the 55 investigated washrooms. Over 97% of the pathogenic tested were resistant to at least one first-line antimicrobial therapeutic agent, including penicillin, cefoxitin, erythromycin, co-trimoxazole, clindamycin and gentamicin, and 22.6% demonstrated co-resistance to at least three antimicrobial agents, with co-resistance to penicillin, erythromycin and clindamycin being the most common. Our findings suggest that hand-drying facilities in public washrooms can act as reservoirs of drug-resistant bacteria. The importance of frequent cleaning and maintenance of public washrooms to promote safe hand hygiene practices for the public are emphasised.