Property-Composition-Temperature Modeling of Waste Glass Melt Data Subject to a Randomization Restriction
Properties such as viscosity and electrical conductivity of glass melts are functions of melt temperature as well as glass composition. When measuring such a property for several compositions, the property is typically measured at several temperatures for one composition, then at several temperature...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of the American Ceramic Society Vol. 91; no. 10; pp. 3222 - 3228 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Malden, USA
Blackwell Publishing Inc
01.10.2008
Blackwell Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Properties such as viscosity and electrical conductivity of glass melts are functions of melt temperature as well as glass composition. When measuring such a property for several compositions, the property is typically measured at several temperatures for one composition, then at several temperatures for the next composition, and so on. This data collection process involves a restriction on randomization, which is referred to as a split‐plot experiment. The split‐plot data structure must be accounted for in developing property–composition–temperature models and the corresponding uncertainty equations for model predictions. Instead of ordinary least squares (OLS) regression methods, generalized least squares (GLS) regression methods using restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimation must be used. This article summarizes the methodology for developing property–composition–temperature models and corresponding prediction uncertainty equations using the GLS/REML regression approach. Viscosity data collected on 197 simulated nuclear waste glasses are used to sequentially develop a viscosity‐composition‐temperature model. The final model has 29 terms in 15 components, reduced from the initial model of 44 terms in 22 components. For the initial model, the correct results using GLS/REML regression are compared with the incorrect results obtained using OLS regression. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:B2BB2DA04E993E571441A75AECC7B9C43E851933 ArticleID:JACE02590 ark:/67375/WNG-5C192GVR-B I. Tanaka—contributing editor This work was conducted in the Waste Treatment Plant Support Program at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. The work was performed under Contract DE‐AC05‐76RL01830 with the U. S. Department of Energy and MOA #24590‐QL‐HC9‐WA49‐00001 with Bechtel National, Inc., the lead contractor on the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant at the Hanford Site near Richland, WA. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 PNNL-SA-58808 USDOE AC05-76RL01830 |
ISSN: | 0002-7820 1551-2916 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02590.x |