Moth tails divert bat attack: Evolution of acoustic deflection

Significance Bats and moths have been engaged in acoustic warfare for more than 60 million y. Yet almost half of moth species lack bat-detecting ears and still face intense bat predation. We hypothesized that the long tails of one group of seemingly defenseless moths, saturniids, are an anti-bat str...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 112; no. 9; pp. 2812 - 2816
Main Authors Barber, Jesse R., Leavell, Brian C., Keener, Adam L., Breinholt, Jesse W., Chadwell, Brad A., McClure, Christopher J. W., Hill, Geena M., Kawahara, Akito Y.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 03.03.2015
National Acad Sciences
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Significance Bats and moths have been engaged in acoustic warfare for more than 60 million y. Yet almost half of moth species lack bat-detecting ears and still face intense bat predation. We hypothesized that the long tails of one group of seemingly defenseless moths, saturniids, are an anti-bat strategy designed to divert bat attacks. Using high-speed infrared videography, we show that the spinning hindwing tails of luna moths lure echolocating bat attacks to these nonessential appendages in over half of bat–moth interactions. Further we show that long hindwing tails have independently evolved multiple times in saturniid moths. This finding expands our knowledge of antipredator deflection strategies, the limitations of bat sonar, and the extent of a long-standing evolutionary arms race. Adaptations to divert the attacks of visually guided predators have evolved repeatedly in animals. Using high-speed infrared videography, we show that luna moths ( Actias luna ) generate an acoustic diversion with spinning hindwing tails to deflect echolocating bat attacks away from their body and toward these nonessential appendages. We pit luna moths against big brown bats ( Eptesicus fuscus ) and demonstrate a survival advantage of ∼47% for moths with tails versus those that had their tails removed. The benefit of hindwing tails is equivalent to the advantage conferred to moths by bat-detecting ears. Moth tails lured bat attacks to these wing regions during 55% of interactions between bats and intact luna moths. We analyzed flight kinematics of moths with and without hindwing tails and suggest that tails have a minimal role in flight performance. Using a robust phylogeny, we find that long spatulate tails have independently evolved four times in saturniid moths, further supporting the selective advantage of this anti-bat strategy. Diversionary tactics are perhaps more common than appreciated in predator–prey interactions. Our finding suggests that focusing on the sensory ecologies of key predators will reveal such countermeasures in prey.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1421926112
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by May R. Berenbaum, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, and approved January 28, 2015 (received for review November 15, 2014)
Author contributions: J.R.B. and A.Y.K. designed research; J.R.B., B.C.L., A.L.K., J.W.B., G.M.H., and A.Y.K. performed research; J.R.B., B.C.L., A.L.K., J.W.B., B.A.C., C.J.W.M., G.M.H., and A.Y.K. analyzed data; and J.R.B. wrote the paper.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1421926112