Are non-human primates capable of rhythmic entrainment? Evidence for the gradual audiomotor evolution hypothesis

We propose a decomposition of the neurocognitive mechanisms that might underlie interval-based timing and rhythmic entrainment. Next to reviewing the concepts central to the definition of rhythmic entrainment, we discuss recent studies that suggest rhythmic entrainment to be specific to humans and a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in neuroscience Vol. 7; p. 274
Main Authors Merchant, Hugo, Honing, Henkjan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Research Foundation 17.01.2014
Frontiers Media S.A
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We propose a decomposition of the neurocognitive mechanisms that might underlie interval-based timing and rhythmic entrainment. Next to reviewing the concepts central to the definition of rhythmic entrainment, we discuss recent studies that suggest rhythmic entrainment to be specific to humans and a selected group of bird species, but, surprisingly, is not obvious in non-human primates. On the basis of these studies we propose the gradual audiomotor evolution hypothesis that suggests that humans fully share interval-based timing with other primates, but only partially share the ability of rhythmic entrainment (or beat-based timing). This hypothesis accommodates the fact that non-human primates (i.e., macaques) performance is comparable to humans in single interval tasks (such as interval reproduction, categorization, and interception), but show differences in multiple interval tasks (such as rhythmic entrainment, synchronization, and continuation). Furthermore, it is in line with the observation that macaques can, apparently, synchronize in the visual domain, but show less sensitivity in the auditory domain. And finally, while macaques are sensitive to interval-based timing and rhythmic grouping, the absence of a strong coupling between the auditory and motor system of non-human primates might be the reason why macaques cannot rhythmically entrain in the way humans do.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
This article was submitted to Auditory Cognitive Neuroscience, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience.
Edited by: Timothy D. Griffiths, Newcastle University, UK
Reviewed by: Michael Brosch, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Germany; Peter Cariani, Harvard Medical School, USA
ISSN:1662-453X
1662-4548
1662-453X
DOI:10.3389/fnins.2013.00274