Negative effects of pesticides on wild bee communities can be buffered by landscape context

• Published in: Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Vol. 282; no. 1809; pp. 1 - 9
• Main Authors: Park, Mia G., Blitzer, E. J., Gibbs, Jason, Losey, John E., Danforth, Bryan N.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England The Royal Society 22.06.2015
• Subjects: Agriculture; Agroecosystem; Animals; Apple; Bees - drug effects; Biota - drug effects; Insecticides - toxicity; Malus - growth & development; Native Bees; New York; Orchards; Pest Management; Pollination - drug effects; New York; apple; native bees; pest management; orchards; agroecosystem
• ISSN: 0962-8452; 1471-2954
• DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0299

Wild bee communities provide underappreciated but critical agricultural pollination services. Given predicted global shortages in pollination services, managing agroecosystems to support thriving wild bee communities is, therefore, central to ensuring sustainable food production. Benefits of natural (including semi-natural) habitat for wild bee abundance and diversity on farms are well documented. By contrast, few studies have examined toxidty of pesticides on wild bees, let alone effects of farm-level pesticide exposure on entire bee communities. Whether beneficial natural areas could mediate effects of harmful pesticides on wild bees is also unknown. Here, we assess the effect of conventional pesticide use on the wild bee community visiting apple (Malus domestica) within a gradient of percentage natural area in the landscape. Wild bee community abundance and species richness decreased linearly with increasing pesticide use in orchards one year after application; however, pesticide effects on wild bees were buffered by increasing proportion of natural habitat in the surrounding landscape. A significant contribution of fungicides to observed pesticide effects suggests deleterious properties of a class of pesticides that was, until recently, considered benign to bees. Our results demonstrate extended benefits of natural areas for wild pollinators and highlight the importance of considering the landscape context when weighing up the costs of pest management on crop pollination services.