The relation of formal education to ethnic prejudice: Its reliability, validity and explanation

This paper examines three issues concerning the frequently documented negative correlation between formal education and ethnic prejudice, namely its reliability, its validity and the manner in which it is mediated. Reliability is demonstrated across three indices of ethnic attitudes in seven represe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of social psychology Vol. 25; no. 1; pp. 41 - 56
Main Authors Wagner, Ulrich, Zick, Andreas
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 1995
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper examines three issues concerning the frequently documented negative correlation between formal education and ethnic prejudice, namely its reliability, its validity and the manner in which it is mediated. Reliability is demonstrated across three indices of ethnic attitudes in seven representative samples drawn from four European countries (West Germany, Netherlands, France, Great Britain; total N=3788). The hypothesis that this correlation reflects only the tendency of more highly educated respondents to give more socially desirable answers and not true attitude differences was inconsistent with the finding from the survey data that educational level also correlated negatively with responses to an index of subtle prejudice. Results from an experiment employing the bogus pipeline procedure similarly refute this hypothesis, indicating that significant education‐related differences in expressed prejudice remain under conditions in which the tendency to give socially desirable responses is reduced. Finally, path analysis based on the survey data show that part but not all of the association between low education and ethnic prejudice is mediated by social psychological variables, particularly group relative deprivation, perceived belief incongruency, political conservatism, and acceptance of inter‐ethnic contact.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-Q0XZW67B-B
istex:B3A36DBC4B2693C73CA5B69702FA4EB31F443C4B
ArticleID:EJSP2420250105
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:1099-0992
0046-2772
1099-0992
DOI:10.1002/ejsp.2420250105