Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization

The purpose of this study is to distinguish between cognitive, affective and evaluative components of social identity in the organization and to show how the components instigate behaviours that benefit in‐group members. A new scale for measuring cognitive organizational identification (i.e. self‐ca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of social psychology Vol. 39; no. 4; pp. 555 - 577
Main Authors Bergami, Massimo, Bagozzi, Richard P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2000
British Psychological Society
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The purpose of this study is to distinguish between cognitive, affective and evaluative components of social identity in the organization and to show how the components instigate behaviours that benefit in‐group members. A new scale for measuring cognitive organizational identification (i.e. self‐categorization) is developed and compared to a leading scale. Internal consistency, convergent validity, predictive validity and generalizability of the two scales are established on a sample of Italian (N=409) and Korean (N=283) workers. Next, convergent and discriminant validity for measures of organizational identification, affective commitment and group self‐esteem are demonstrated. Then, two antecedents of these components of social identity are examined: organization prestige and organization stereotypes. Finally, the mediating role of the components of social identity are investigated between the antecedents and five forms of citizenship behaviours. The last three analyses are performed on the Italian (N=409) workers. Among other findings, the results show that affective commitment and self‐esteem are the primary motivators of citizenship behaviours. Moreover, cognitive identification performs as a central mediator between prestige and stereotypes on the one hand, and affective commitment and self‐esteem on the other. Identification is thus an indirect determinant of citizenship behaviours.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-T9MH5PXK-1
ArticleID:BJSO64
istex:CD588047F72842034899E29BE3B4E32E22A372FB
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0144-6665
2044-8309
DOI:10.1348/014466600164633