Retribution and emotional regulation: The effects of time delay in angry economic interactions

• Published in: Organizational behavior and human decision processes Vol. 116; no. 1; pp. 46 - 54
• Main Authors: Wang, Cynthia S., Sivanathan, Niro, Narayanan, Jayanth, Ganegoda, Deshani B., Bauer, Monika, Bodenhausen, Galen V., Murnighan, Keith
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Kidlington Elsevier Inc 01.09.2011; Elsevier; Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc
• Series: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
• Subjects: Anger; Biological and medical sciences; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Delay; Emotional regulation; Emotions; Experiments; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Human behaviour; Negative emotions; Organizational behavior; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychophysiology; Punishment; Regulation; Retribution; Rumination; Social interactions. Communication. Group processes; Social psychology; Studies; Third parties; Thought patterns; Time; Time delay; Time delay Retribution Emotional regulation Anger Rumination; Emotional regulation; Anger; Time delay; Rumination; Retribution; Human; Affect affectivity; Emotion emotionality; Psychological effect; Time lag; Economy; Self regulation; Time interval
• ISSN: 0749-5978; 1095-9920
• DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.05.007

► We investigate the effects of time delays and thought patterns on punishments in direct and third party interactions. Although time delays can decrease punishments driven by negative emotions, they can also produce unintended consequences. ► Time delays decreased punishments by reducing negative emotions. However, thought patterns during a delay were important: people who engaged in a distraction task punished less; people who engaged in affective rumination punished more; and people who engaged in cognitive reappraisal were unaffected by a delay. ► After a time delay, affective ruminators administered greater punishments than cognitive reappraisers or distracted individuals. Individuals driven by negative emotions often punish non-cooperators at a cost to themselves. The current research demonstrates that, although time delays can attenuate this effect, they can also produce unintended consequences. Five experiments investigated the effects of time delays and thought patterns on punishments in direct and third party interactions. The results show that time delays decreased punishment (Experiment 1) by reducing negative emotions (Experiments 2A and 2B). However, thought patterns during a delay were crucially important (Experiments 3A and 3B): People who engaged in a distraction task punished less; people who engaged in affective rumination punished more; and people who engaged in cognitive reappraisal were unaffected by a delay. These differences meant that, after a time delay, affective ruminators administered greater punishments than cognitive reappraisers or distracted individuals. Implications of these findings for managing punitive impulses via time delays are discussed.