Measurement of Pectoralis Minor Muscle Length in Women Diagnosed With Breast Cancer: Reliability, Validity, and Clinical Application

• Published in: Physical therapy Vol. 100; no. 3; pp. 429 - 437
• Main Authors: Harrington, Shana E, Hoffman, Julie, Katsavelis, Dimitrios
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Oxford University Press 01.03.2020
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Breast cancer; Breast Neoplasms - pathology; Breast Neoplasms - therapy; Cancer treatment; Confidence Intervals; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Humans; Injuries; Measurement; Middle Aged; Motion capture; Observer Variation; Organ Motion; Organ Size; Palpation - instrumentation; Palpation - methods; Pectoralis Muscles - pathology; Physical therapists; Reproducibility of Results; Scapula - pathology; Shoulder pain; Validity; Women
• ISSN: 0031-9023; 1538-6724
• DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzz174

Abstract Background Decreased pectoralis minor muscle length is common after primary breast cancer treatment and can result in an abnormal position of the scapula. This position can contribute to shoulder pain and pathomechanics and can lead to problems such as impingement syndrome, rotator cuff tears, and frozen shoulder. Currently, there are limited reliable methods for measuring pectoralis minor length. Objective The objective of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of measuring pectoralis minor length in women diagnosed with breast cancer. Design This was a cross-sectional reliability and validity study. Methods Bilateral pectoralis minor length (in centimeters) was assessed using a palpation meter in women (N = 29) diagnosed with breast cancer by 2 licensed physical therapists who were masked to the measures. Bilateral pectoralis minor length was also measured using a motion capture system to assess validity. Results Intratester reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC [3,k] = 0.971; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.939–0.986; standard error of measurement [SEM] = 0.16 cm) and intertester reliability (ICC[3,k] = 0.915; 95% CI = 0.81–0.962; SEM = 0.31 cm) were excellent for the palpation meter on the affected side and the unaffected side (intratester reliability: ICC[3,k] = 0.951; 95% CI = 0.897–0.977; SEM = 0.19 cm; intertester reliability: ICC[3,k] = 0.945; 95% CI = 0.877–0.975; SEM = 0.22 cm). Significant correlations were found between the motion capture system and the palpation meter on the affected side (r = 0.87) and the unaffected side (r = 0.81). Bland-Altman plots between the palpation meter and the motion capture system demonstrated that all the measures fell within the limits of agreement. Limitations This study encountered possible errors with the accuracy of the motion capture system tracking because of the proximity of the markers and inherent volumetric restrictions. Conclusions The palpation meter is a reliable, valid, easily administered, and cost-effective tool for assessing pectoralis minor length in women with breast cancer.