Belief in Conspiracy Theories and Susceptibility to the Conjunction Fallacy

Summary People who believe in the paranormal have been found to be particularly susceptible to the conjunction fallacy. The present research examines whether the same is true of people who endorse conspiracy theories. Two studies examined the association between conspiracist ideation and the number...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inApplied cognitive psychology Vol. 28; no. 2; pp. 238 - 248
Main Authors Brotherton, Robert, French, Christopher C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2014
Wiley
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary People who believe in the paranormal have been found to be particularly susceptible to the conjunction fallacy. The present research examines whether the same is true of people who endorse conspiracy theories. Two studies examined the association between conspiracist ideation and the number of conjunction violations made in a variety of contexts (neutral, paranormal and conspiracy). Study 1 found that participants who endorsed a range of popular conspiracy theories more strongly also made more conjunction errors than participants with weaker conspiracism, regardless of the contextual framing of the conjunction. Study 2, using an independent sample and a generic measure of conspiracist ideation, replicated the finding that conspiracy belief is associated with domain‐general susceptibility to the conjunction fallacy. The findings are discussed in relation to the association between conspiracism and other anomalous beliefs, the representativeness heuristic and the tendency to infer underlying causal relationships connecting ostensibly unrelated events. © 2014 The Authors. Applied Cognitive Psychology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Bibliography:istex:5550A16988F705AB467FD73520B2687AF89CD5E0
Economic and Social Research Council - No. ES/I90249X
ark:/67375/WNG-NBX15TSJ-W
ArticleID:ACP2995
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0888-4080
1099-0720
DOI:10.1002/acp.2995