不同异基因造血干细胞移植方式治疗167例中高危骨髓增生异常综合征疗效比较
目的比较半相合移植(Haplo-HSCT)、无关供者移植(MUD-HSCT)及同胞相合移植(MSD-HSCT)治疗中高危骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)的疗效及其预后影响因素。 方法回顾性分析2001年8月至2015年5月接受异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)治疗的167例中高危MDS患者病例资料,比较不同移植方式下患者的预后特征及预后影响因素。 结果存活患者中位随访60(12-177)个月。5年实际累积无病生存(DFS)率为67.8%(95% CI 60.0%-75.6%),其中MSD-HSCT组为68.0%(95% CI 54.1%-81.9%),MUD-HSCT组为77.4%(95%...
Saved in:
Published in | 中华血液学杂志 Vol. 38; no. 4; pp. 301 - 306 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | Chinese |
Published |
河北燕达陆道培医院干细胞治疗科, 河北廊坊三河市,065200
2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0253-2727 |
DOI | 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.04.008 |
Cover
Summary: | 目的比较半相合移植(Haplo-HSCT)、无关供者移植(MUD-HSCT)及同胞相合移植(MSD-HSCT)治疗中高危骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)的疗效及其预后影响因素。
方法回顾性分析2001年8月至2015年5月接受异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)治疗的167例中高危MDS患者病例资料,比较不同移植方式下患者的预后特征及预后影响因素。
结果存活患者中位随访60(12-177)个月。5年实际累积无病生存(DFS)率为67.8%(95% CI 60.0%-75.6%),其中MSD-HSCT组为68.0%(95% CI 54.1%-81.9%),MUD-HSCT组为77.4%(95% CI 62.1%-92.7%),Haplo-HSCT组为64.0%(95% CI 52.4%-75.6%),三组比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.632)。单因素分析结果显示移植前病程〉12个月者累积DFS率明显低于≤12个月者(P=0.018)。5年累积复发死亡率和移植相关死亡率(TRM)与上面危险因素均无明显相关性。
结论Haplo-HSCT治疗MDS疗效显著,可以作为重要的替代供者,特别是在缺乏MSD而病情紧急没有时间去等待搜索MUD的情况下,可以主动选择;移植前病程是影响DFS的重要因素。 |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; Myelodysplastic syndrome; Prognosis 12-1090/R Lu Yue, Wu Tong, Zhao Yanli, Cao Xingyu, Liu Deyan, Xiong Min, Zhou Jiarui, Zhang Jianping, Wei Zho'ie, Sun Ruij'uan, Lu Daopei. (Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Hebei Yanda Ludaopei Hospital, Langfang 065200, China) Objective To investigate three different types of donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for intermediate and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Methods Between August 2001 and May 2015, 167 consecutive patients with MDS in intermediate and high-risk who underwent allogeneic HSCT were analyzed retrospectively. Results With the median follow up of 60 (12-177) months, The total 5-year DFS was 67.8% (95% CI 60.0%-75.6% ). Among three different types of donor, 5-year DFS rates were 68.0%(95%CI 54.1%-81.9%) in MSD-HSCT vs 77.4%(95%CI 62.1%- 92.7% ) in MUD- HSCT vs 64.0% (95% CI 52.4%- 75.6% ) in Haplo- HSCT (P=0.632), respectively. Univariate analysis showed that median disease course be |
ISSN: | 0253-2727 |
DOI: | 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.04.008 |