Molecular epidemiology of koi herpesvirus

Three regions of koi herpesvirus (KHV) genomic DNA were compared for 34 samples from Japan, six from Indonesia, two from Taiwan, one from the Philippines, 13 from the Netherlands, one from the UK, one from the USA and one from Israel. The analyzed genomic regions included known PCR-detection targets...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFish Pathology Vol. 44; no. 2; pp. 59 - 66
Main Authors Kurita, J.(National Research Inst. of Aquaculture, Tamaki, Mie (Japan). Tamaki Station), Yuasa, K, Ito, T, Sano, M, Hedrick, R.P, Engelsma, M.Y, Haenen, O.L.M, Sunarto, A, Kholidin, E.B, Chou, H.Y, Tung, M.C, de la Pena, L, Lio-Po, G, Tu, C, Way, K, Iida, T
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published The Japanese Society of Fish Pathology 2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Three regions of koi herpesvirus (KHV) genomic DNA were compared for 34 samples from Japan, six from Indonesia, two from Taiwan, one from the Philippines, 13 from the Netherlands, one from the UK, one from the USA and one from Israel. The analyzed genomic regions included known PCR-detection targets (Sph1-5, 9/5 and the thymidine kinase gene). The KHVs from Asian countries were very homogeneous, although two variants were noted based on a single nucleotide polymorphism. In contrast, seven variants were found in KHVs from outside of Asia, and although closely related to one another, they were clearly distinct from those from Asian. The results suggest that a clear genetic distinction exists between Asian and European (including each single isolate from the USA and Israel) types of KHV, and that unique types of KHV were independently introduced or emerged in the respective geographic locations.
Bibliography:2009006041
L73
L10
M12
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0388-788X
1881-7335
DOI:10.3147/jsfp.44.59