Secretion and subcellular localizations of bacterial proteins: a semantic awareness issue

Extracellular proteins are a subject of intense interest because of their essential roles in bacterial lifestyles. However, several terms related to secretion are used confusingly in the literature, and this is a topical issue in genomics and proteomics. Defining a secreted protein as actively trans...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTrends in microbiology (Regular ed.) Vol. 17; no. 4; pp. 139 - 145
Main Authors Desvaux, Mickaël, Hébraud, Michel, Talon, Régine, Henderson, Ian R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.04.2009
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Extracellular proteins are a subject of intense interest because of their essential roles in bacterial lifestyles. However, several terms related to secretion are used confusingly in the literature, and this is a topical issue in genomics and proteomics. Defining a secreted protein as actively translocated via a secretion system, here, we put into perspective that homologous translocation systems can result in radically different subcellular localizations of a secreted protein. We propose using standardized nomenclature for secretion systems from type I to type VIII for Gram-negative bacteria only, whereas the terms ‘Sec’ (secretion), ‘Tat’ (twin-arginine translocation), ‘FEA’ (flagella export apparatus), ‘FPE’ (fimbrilin-protein exporter), ‘holin’ (hole forming) and ‘Wss’ (WXG100 secretion system) should be applied to translocation systems across the cytoplasmic membrane of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Finally, we discuss why the term ‘exoproteome’ should be favoured over ‘secretome’ when describing the subset of proteins present in the extracellular milieu.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0966-842X
1878-4380
DOI:10.1016/j.tim.2009.01.004