Secretion and subcellular localizations of bacterial proteins: a semantic awareness issue
Extracellular proteins are a subject of intense interest because of their essential roles in bacterial lifestyles. However, several terms related to secretion are used confusingly in the literature, and this is a topical issue in genomics and proteomics. Defining a secreted protein as actively trans...
Saved in:
Published in | Trends in microbiology (Regular ed.) Vol. 17; no. 4; pp. 139 - 145 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Elsevier Ltd
01.04.2009
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Extracellular proteins are a subject of intense interest because of their essential roles in bacterial lifestyles. However, several terms related to secretion are used confusingly in the literature, and this is a topical issue in genomics and proteomics. Defining a secreted protein as actively translocated via a secretion system, here, we put into perspective that homologous translocation systems can result in radically different subcellular localizations of a secreted protein. We propose using standardized nomenclature for secretion systems from type I to type VIII for Gram-negative bacteria only, whereas the terms ‘Sec’ (secretion), ‘Tat’ (twin-arginine translocation), ‘FEA’ (flagella export apparatus), ‘FPE’ (fimbrilin-protein exporter), ‘holin’ (hole forming) and ‘Wss’ (WXG100 secretion system) should be applied to translocation systems across the cytoplasmic membrane of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Finally, we discuss why the term ‘exoproteome’ should be favoured over ‘secretome’ when describing the subset of proteins present in the extracellular milieu. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0966-842X 1878-4380 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.tim.2009.01.004 |