Screening biomarkers for spinal cord injury using weighted gene co-expression network analysis and machine learning

Immune changes and inflammatory responses have been identified as central events in the pathological process of spinal cord injury. They can greatly affect nerve regeneration and functional recovery. However, there is still limited understanding of the peripheral immune inflammatory response in spin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeural regeneration research Vol. 19; no. 12; pp. 2723 - 2734
Main Authors Li, Xiaolu, Yang, Ye, Xu, Senming, Gui, Yuchang, Chen, Jianmin, Xu, Jianwen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published India Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 01.12.2024
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine,The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University,Nanning,Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region,China%Department of Rehabilitation Medicine,Guilin People's Hospital,Guilin,Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region,China%Department of Rehabilitation Medicine,The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University,Fuzhou,Fujian Province,China
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
Edition2
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Immune changes and inflammatory responses have been identified as central events in the pathological process of spinal cord injury. They can greatly affect nerve regeneration and functional recovery. However, there is still limited understanding of the peripheral immune inflammatory response in spinal cord injury. In this study, we obtained microRNA expression profiles from the peripheral blood of patients with spinal cord injury using high-throughput sequencing. We also obtained the mRNA expression profile of spinal cord injury patients from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (GSE151371). We identified 54 differentially expressed microRNAs and 1656 differentially expressed genes using bioinformatics approaches. Functional enrichment analysis revealed that various common immune and inflammation-related signaling pathways, such as neutrophil extracellular trap formation pathway, T cell receptor signaling pathway, and nuclear factor-κB signal pathway, were abnormally activated or inhibited in spinal cord injury patient samples. We applied an integrated strategy that combines weighted gene co-expression network analysis, LASSO logistic regression, and SVM-RFE algorithm and identified three biomarkers associated with spinal cord injury: ANO10, BST1, and ZFP36L2. We verified the expression levels and diagnostic performance of these three genes in the original training dataset and clinical samples through the receiver operating characteristic curve. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction results showed that ANO10 and BST1 mRNA levels were increased and ZFP36L2 mRNA was decreased in the peripheral blood of spinal cord injury patients. We also constructed a small RNA-mRNA interaction network using Cytoscape. Additionally, we evaluated the proportion of 22 types of immune cells in the peripheral blood of spinal cord injury patients using the CIBERSORT tool. The proportions of naïve B cells, plasma cells, monocytes, and neutrophils were increased while the proportions of memory B cells, CD8+ T cells, resting natural killer cells, resting dendritic cells, and eosinophils were markedly decreased in spinal cord injury patients increased compared with healthy subjects, and ANO10, BST1 and ZFP26L2 were closely related to the proportion of certain immune cell types. The findings from this study provide new directions for the development of treatment strategies related to immune inflammation in spinal cord injury and suggest that ANO10, BST1, and ZFP36L2 are potential biomarkers for spinal cord injury. The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration No. ChiCTR2200066985, December 12, 2022).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Author contributions: Study design: JX, XL, JC; performed the experiments: XL, YY, SX, YG; data collection and analysis: YY, SX, YG; manuscript writing: XL, JC. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.
Both authors contributed equally to the work.
ISSN:1673-5374
1876-7958
DOI:10.4103/1673-5374.391306