Mass spectrometry-based immuno-precipitation proteomics - The user's guide

Immuno-precipitation (IP) experiments using MS provide a sensitive and accurate way of characterising protein complexes and their response to regulatory mechanisms. Differences in stoichiometry can be determined as well as the reliable identification of specific binding partners. The quality control...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProteomics (Weinheim) Vol. 11; no. 6; pp. 1153 - 1159
Main Authors ten Have, Sara, Boulon, Séverine, Ahmad, Yasmeen, Lamond, Angus I
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Weinheim Wiley-VCH Verlag 01.03.2011
WILEY-VCH Verlag
WILEY‐VCH Verlag
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1615-9853
1615-9861
1615-9861
DOI10.1002/pmic.201000548

Cover

More Information
Summary:Immuno-precipitation (IP) experiments using MS provide a sensitive and accurate way of characterising protein complexes and their response to regulatory mechanisms. Differences in stoichiometry can be determined as well as the reliable identification of specific binding partners. The quality control of IP and protein interaction studies has its basis in the biology that is being observed. Is that unusual protein identification a genuine novelty, or an experimental irregularity? Antibodies and the solid matrices used in these techniques isolate not only the target protein and its specific interaction partners but also many non-specific ‘contaminants' requiring a structured analysis strategy. These methodological developments and the speed and accuracy of MS machines, which has been increasing consistently in the last 5 years, have expanded the number of proteins identified and complexity of analysis. The European Science Foundation's Frontiers in Functional Genomics programme ‘Quality Control in Proteomics' Workshop provided a forum for disseminating knowledge and experience on this subject. Our aim in this technical brief is to outline clearly, for the scientists wanting to carry out this kind of experiment, and recommend what, in our experience, are the best potential ways to design an IP experiment, to help identify possible pitfalls, discuss important controls and outline how to manage and analyse the large amount of data generated. Detailed experimental methodologies have been referenced but not described in the form of protocols.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201000548
Wellcome Trust Program Grant - No. 073980/Z/03/Z
istex:8C9C3405B110449616D75960A461F2488A9F046A
University of Dundee's Fingerprints Proteomics
ark:/67375/WNG-H4JBQ624-P
ArticleID:PMIC201000548
European Union (EU) FP7 Grant Proteomics Specification in Time and Space (PROSPECTS)
Radical Solutions for Researching the Proteome (RASOR)
EU Network of Excellence Grant European Alternative Splicing Network (EURASNET)
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Scottish Higher Education Funding Council and Medical Research Council (MRC)
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:1615-9853
1615-9861
1615-9861
DOI:10.1002/pmic.201000548