Mass spectrometry-based immuno-precipitation proteomics - The user's guide
Immuno-precipitation (IP) experiments using MS provide a sensitive and accurate way of characterising protein complexes and their response to regulatory mechanisms. Differences in stoichiometry can be determined as well as the reliable identification of specific binding partners. The quality control...
Saved in:
Published in | Proteomics (Weinheim) Vol. 11; no. 6; pp. 1153 - 1159 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Weinheim
Wiley-VCH Verlag
01.03.2011
WILEY-VCH Verlag WILEY‐VCH Verlag Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1615-9853 1615-9861 1615-9861 |
DOI | 10.1002/pmic.201000548 |
Cover
Summary: | Immuno-precipitation (IP) experiments using MS provide a sensitive and accurate way of characterising protein complexes and their response to regulatory mechanisms. Differences in stoichiometry can be determined as well as the reliable identification of specific binding partners. The quality control of IP and protein interaction studies has its basis in the biology that is being observed. Is that unusual protein identification a genuine novelty, or an experimental irregularity? Antibodies and the solid matrices used in these techniques isolate not only the target protein and its specific interaction partners but also many non-specific ‘contaminants' requiring a structured analysis strategy. These methodological developments and the speed and accuracy of MS machines, which has been increasing consistently in the last 5 years, have expanded the number of proteins identified and complexity of analysis. The European Science Foundation's Frontiers in Functional Genomics programme ‘Quality Control in Proteomics' Workshop provided a forum for disseminating knowledge and experience on this subject. Our aim in this technical brief is to outline clearly, for the scientists wanting to carry out this kind of experiment, and recommend what, in our experience, are the best potential ways to design an IP experiment, to help identify possible pitfalls, discuss important controls and outline how to manage and analyse the large amount of data generated. Detailed experimental methodologies have been referenced but not described in the form of protocols. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201000548 Wellcome Trust Program Grant - No. 073980/Z/03/Z istex:8C9C3405B110449616D75960A461F2488A9F046A University of Dundee's Fingerprints Proteomics ark:/67375/WNG-H4JBQ624-P ArticleID:PMIC201000548 European Union (EU) FP7 Grant Proteomics Specification in Time and Space (PROSPECTS) Radical Solutions for Researching the Proteome (RASOR) EU Network of Excellence Grant European Alternative Splicing Network (EURASNET) Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Scottish Higher Education Funding Council and Medical Research Council (MRC) ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 1615-9853 1615-9861 1615-9861 |
DOI: | 10.1002/pmic.201000548 |