A Structural and Functional Acromegaly Classification

• Published in: The journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism Vol. 100; no. 1; pp. 122 - 131
• Main Authors: Cuevas-Ramos, Daniel, Carmichael, John D., Cooper, Odelia, Bonert, Vivien S., Gertych, Arkadiusz, Mamelak, Adam N., Melmed, Shlomo
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Oxford University Press 01.01.2015; Copyright by The Endocrine Society; Endocrine Society
• Subjects: Acromegaly; Acromegaly - classification; Acromegaly - pathology; Adenoma; Adult; Aged; Brain tumors; Classification; Cluster analysis; Cross-Sectional Studies; Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21; Endocrine Care; Female; Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Adenoma - classification; Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Adenoma - pathology; Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Adenoma - secretion; Growth hormones; Humans; Insulin-like growth factor I; Insulin-Like Growth Factor I - metabolism; Insulin-like growth factors; Magnetic resonance imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Optic chiasm; Pituitary; Pituitary Neoplasms - classification; Pituitary Neoplasms - pathology; Pituitary Neoplasms - secretion; Somatostatin; Structure-function relationships; Tumors
• ISSN: 0021-972X; 1945-7197; 1945-7197
• DOI: 10.1210/jc.2014-2468

Context:GH-secreting pituitary adenomas exhibit heterogeneous natural history ranging from small tumors to large aggressive adenomas.Objective:To rigorously classify an acromegaly patient cohort defined by clinical, radiological, histopathological, and outcome characteristics.Design:Cross-sectional study.Setting:Tertiary referral pituitary center.Patients:Subjects were selected from a pituitary tumor research registry that includes 1178 patients with pituitary disease. Cluster analysis was performed on 338 acromegaly patients.Interventions:None.Main Outcome Measures:Biochemically active disease with elevated IGF-1 levels at follow-up.Results:Cluster analysis of all patients yielded 292 who were rigorously classified to three acromegaly types. Type 1 (50%) comprised older patients with the longest follow-up and most favorable outcomes, characterized by densely granulated, nonaggressive microadenomas and macroadenomas. Type 1 tumors extend to the sphenoid sinus more frequently than suprasellar extension (concave tumor image) and express abundant immunoreactive p21 and somatostatin receptor 2. Type 2 (19%) comprised noninvasive, densely or sparsely granulated macroadenomas, without significant extension (flat tumor image), with intermediate biochemical outcome. Type 3 (31%) was characterized by sparsely granulated aggressive macroadenomas and comprised patients with adverse therapeutic outcomes, despite receiving more treatments. These tumors extend to both the sphenoid sinus and suprasellar regions with commonly encountered optic chiasm compression (“peanut” magnetic resonance image), with low tumor p21 and somatostatin receptor 2 expression.Conclusions:After validation, this classification may be useful to accurately identify acromegaly patients with distinctive patterns of disease aggressiveness and outcome, as well as to provide an accurate tool for selection criteria in clinical studies.