HLA associations and HLA sharing in recurrent miscarriage: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract Problem The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate whether specific maternal HLA alleles and HLA sharing of couples are associated with the occurrence of recurrent miscarriage (RM). Method of study A systematic literature search was performed for studies that evaluated the association be...
Saved in:
Published in | Human immunology Vol. 76; no. 5; pp. 362 - 373 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.05.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract Problem The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate whether specific maternal HLA alleles and HLA sharing of couples are associated with the occurrence of recurrent miscarriage (RM). Method of study A systematic literature search was performed for studies that evaluated the association between HLA alleles, HLA sharing and RM. RM was defined as three or more consecutive unexplained miscarriages and a control group was included of women with at least one live birth and no miscarriages in their history. Meta-analyses were performed and the pooled odds ratio (OR) was calculated. Results We included 41 studies. Selection bias was present in 40 studies and information bias in all studies. Meta-analyses showed an increased risk of RM in mothers carrying a HLA-DRB1*4 (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.05–1.90), HLA-DRB1*15 (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.15–2.14), or a HLA-E*01:01 allele (OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.20–1.81), and a decreased risk with HLA-DRB1*13 (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45–0.89) or HLA-DRB1*14 (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.31–0.94). Pooling results for HLA sharing showed that HLA-B sharing (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.11–1.75) and HLA-DR sharing (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.10–1.25) were both associated with the occurrence of RM. Conclusion Although the present systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that specific HLA alleles and HLA sharing are associated with RM, a high degree of bias was present and therefore observed results should be interpreted carefully. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 ObjectType-Article-3 ObjectType-Undefined-4 ObjectType-Article-1 |
ISSN: | 0198-8859 1879-1166 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.humimm.2015.02.004 |