Systemic combination therapy of intravenous continuous 5-fluorouracil and subcutaneous pegylated interferon alfa-2a for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Background In Japan, sorafenib is now the first-line therapy for individuals with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but no other treatment is available for such patients. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with systemic continuous intravenous in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of gastroenterology Vol. 47; no. 10; pp. 1152 - 1159
Main Authors Uchino, Koji, Obi, Shuntaro, Tateishi, Ryosuke, Sato, Shinpei, Kanda, Miho, Sato, Takahisa, Arano, Toru, Enooku, Kenichiro, Goto, Eriko, Masuzaki, Ryota, Nakagawa, Hayato, Asaoka, Yoshinari, Kondo, Yuji, Yamashiki, Noriyo, Goto, Tadashi, Shiina, Shuichiro, Omata, Masao, Yoshida, Haruhiko, Koike, Kazuhiko
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan Springer Japan 01.10.2012
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background In Japan, sorafenib is now the first-line therapy for individuals with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but no other treatment is available for such patients. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with systemic continuous intravenous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and subcutaneous peginterferon alfa-2a, which was used before sorafenib was introduced to Japan. Methods Two hundred and twenty-three HCC patients, who were not amenable to curative surgery, percutaneous ablation, or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and for whom intraarterial chemotherapy was not indicated because of the presence of extrahepatic metastasis or stenosis of the common hepatic artery, received peginterferon alfa-2a (90 μg subcutaneously on days 1, 8, 15, and 22) and 5-FU (500 mg/day intravenously given continuously on days 1–5 and 8–12). We assessed their response to treatment and survival, and treatment safety. Results The response rate was 9.4 % (including six patients with complete response) and the disease-control rate was 32.7 %. The median time to progression was 2.0 months. The overall median survival time was 6.5 months (Child–Pugh class A: 9.2 months vs. Child–Pugh class B: 2.8 months). In a multivariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status >0, Child–Pugh class B, and the presence of macroscopic vascular invasion were independent predictors of poor prognosis. The major grade 3–4 adverse events were leucopenia (13.9 %) and thrombocytopenia (5.8 %). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions This combination therapy was well tolerated and showed promising efficacy. Further studies are needed to establish the usefulness of this treatment.
ISSN:0944-1174
1435-5922
DOI:10.1007/s00535-012-0574-3